
Who Goes There?
We don’t know that much about Lucile Taylor Hansen. I’m not even sure if we have a photo of her. The funny thing is that when she had a story published in Wonder Stories a sketch of a made-up man was used to conceal her gender, and even the introductory blurb for “The Undersea Tube” seems determined to not refer to gender at all. This might’ve been an idea of the editors, or it could’ve been Hansen’s. It was not unusual in the pulp days for educated women to initialize their first names for publication so as to keep a degree of separation between their writing careers and their day jobs. Hansen herself was well versed in anthropology and geology, doing graduate work at UCLA, and with most of her published work being science articles and books rather than SF. With regards to Amazing Stories she actually contributed far more articles than stories, and over a much longer period of time. But, as so often happens with lady SF writers from this era, she sort of just vanished from the face of the earth one day. Why she insisted on hiding her gender and her first name even into the 1940s, by which time it had become pretty normal to see women use their full names in the genre magazines, nobody can really say.
This is all more intriguing than the story I’m about to write about, which is a robust but underdeveloped bit of 1920s super-science. By this point in the history of Amazing Stories, Hugo Gernsback had relinquished control and indeed took little time in founding a new SF magazine, Science Wonder Stories. T. O’Conor Sloane, formerly the managing editor, then descended to become editor of Amazing Stories. Maybe this was due to old age (Sloane honestly might be the oldest editor of a genre magazine in history, being in his eighties when he finally stepped down in 1937), but Sloane was not as forward-thinking as Gernsback; and while Gernsback had the issue of not paying his authors, Sloane was incredibly slow with accepting/rejecting manuscripts, even losing them on occasion. Unfortunately for both Sloane and the magazine, Amazing Stories was about to get some serious competition in the forms of Astounding Stories and Gernsback’s Wonder Stories. It doesn’t help that some writers and artists, like Frank R. Paul, stayed loyal to Gernsback and jumped ship.
Placing Coordinates
First published in the November 1929 issue of Amazing Stories. It wouldn’t be reprinted until it appeared in Amazing Stories…. again, this time in the May 1961 issue. It has also appeared in The Best of Amazing Stories: The 1929 Anthology (ed. Steve Davidson and Jean Marie Stein). It’s in the public domain, and is on Project Gutenberg.
Enhancing Image
Hansen goes out of her way to explain the logistics behind the Undersea Tube, to the point where the worldbuilding takes up about a third of what is already a short story. This is both a good and bad thing. Bob, the narrator, tells us right away that the Undersea Tube, much like Jurassic Park, ended up a disaster and with a body count. Bob is, in fact, the sole survivor of the disaster. (To get a spoiler out of the way, how he managed to survive the wreck and no one else is never explained.) There are actually a few questions Hansen raises and then deliberately leaves unanswered. What we get is very much speculative fiction, in that there’s earnest speculation about the viability of undersea subways, with a strong mystery element, plus maybe just a hint of fantasy. But we’ll get to that last part in a minute. Bob took the Undersea Tube, namely the tube going between Liverpool and New York City, the most ambitious feat of human engineering in history thus far. There are a few other tubes in operations, namely one going between France and England and another between Canada (Montreal [not fucking Toronto?]) and the US (Chicago), but the Undersea Tube is transatlantic, going across (or rather under) a whole ocean.
Would it be practical to construct a subway that goes across the Atlantic, buried under the ocean floor, as an alternative to commercial airplanes? I’m pretty sure no. Of course, flying across the Atlantic was itself a dangerous prospect in 1929, and some aviators gave their lives to prove this. But Hansen puts in the effort to make the Undersea Tube sound plausible. We even get a few drawings (I assume courtesy of Hansen) showing the tube’s makeup in blueprint form. This is the sort of effort one can easily admire. As for the story, Bob talks with Dutch, a former college roommate (not sure how old they’re supposed to be, but given how long the Undersea Tube must’ve taken to build and a couple jokes the two make, I have to think they’re at least middle-aged) about the Tube. Bob wants to take the Tube from the US to Europe, having some business on the other side and having never taken the Tube before, but Dutch is worried. Ditch is convinced the Tube will succumb to a disaster in the near future—not because of a fault with the Tube itself, but because of the earth around the Tube. To make a long explanation very short, Dutch suspects an earthquake fault is the reason a certain crack, which had formed a while ago, has only gotten wider. There’s a specific spot in the solid rock that’s bound to break open.
This is all told in a matter-of-fact way, as if a journalist were writing a report—appropriate, considering the story we’re reading is a report Bob wrote for “the International Committee for the Investigation of Disasters,” after having survived the incident with the Tube. It’s not sensationalist, at least for the most part, in contrast with a lot of SF of this vintage. Bob and Dutch are one step above total cardboard, but they also aren’t charicatures the likes of which I’ve often found from this era. Dutch was one of the engineers who helped build the Tube in the first place, but since then he’s become disillusioned with his creation. He ultimately decides to ride the Tube on the same voyage as Bob, and as you can guess, he doesn’t make it. His decision to ride to Tube, despite warning Bob, implies he has a death wish, being at least passively suicidal. Melancholy very rarely appears in SF from this era, so that in itself is also a rarity. Finally, the decision to tell us how the story ends right at the beginning while also leaving out an important plot detail, only hinting at it at the outset, is a bit of sophisticated storytelling that makes me think Hansen had a good idea of what she was doing. We’re given a few crumbs of info at the beginning, but not the context until later. I consider “The Undersea Tube” to be lopsided in its pacing and altogether too short, but for its faults it’s by no means half-assed or unoriginal.
There Be Spoilers Here
Early on we’re told about a very strange event that happened in the midst of the Tube’s construction. The diggers had unearthed a cavern, itself seemingly a tomb for a jeweled casket, in which lied a beautiful dead woman. She had been dead for years, maybe centuries, but still appeared young and fresh, as if sleeping—until the casket was opened. The air did not agree with the corpse. But who thise woman could’ve possibly been or where she came from remained forever a mystery. We do get something like an answer when Bob becomes a passenger on the Tube and becomes unexpected bunkmates with an old man who is never identified and whose body is never found among the wreckage afterward. Mund you that the part of the story involving Bob in the Tube is shockingly brief, being little more than a footnote in the wake of what was a ton of lore and super-science. I was really surprised when I came to the end of the story and found that it had, well, ended, as soon as it did. The discovery of an undersea city, perhaps Atlantis, is made ambiguous since Bob is the only one alive to have seen it, and even then he doubts himself. It could be that people who look just like us lived in this decadent and apparently now abandoned city, which if you ask me threatens to venture straight into the realm of fantasy. To think there was a time where people, even educated people, took the idea of Atlantis or Mu seriously. This is a thread Hansen leaves hanging, an unanswered question that could be taken as a positive or a negative.
A Step Farther Out
I’ve been doing a marathon of short stories printed in Amazing Stories in the 1920s and ’30s this month, and so far “The Undersea Tube” might be the one most worth recommending, if not “objectively” the best. It’s genuinely SFnal while also being more than a little different from so many other stories published in the same magazine at around the same time. There’s a tangible sense of mystery and wonder Hansen works to invoke. She was doing something inventive here, so I can understand that even with so few stories under her belt (she wrote less than ten), she still became a subject of interest for fans at the time. At the same time it says something that despite her lack of “literary” prowess she was probably one of the best SF writers to come out of that particular generation.
See you next time.








