-
Short Story Review: “The Wings of a Bat” by Pauline Ashwell

(Cover by John Schoenherr. Analog, May 1966.) Who Goes There?
Two stories in (today’s pick being the second) and I’m pretty sure I’m a Pauline Ashwell convert. Ashwell debuted in 1958 with two SF stories, one under her own name and the other under the Paul Ash pseudonym (I’m not sure if anyone was bamboozled by this), getting two Hugo nominations the following year—the first for her emaculate novella “Unwillingly to School” and the second for Best New Author (went to No Award, although Brian Aldiss came close). She was one of the first female authors to get Hugo-nominated in any of the fiction categories, but despite this and the quality of her work she remains depressingly obscure; it probably doesn’t help that she wrote exclusively for Astounding and later Analog. Many of Ashwell’s short stories (admittedly there aren’t too many of them) have never been reprinted, and according to a certain insider friend of mine her estate has been basically impossible to get in touch with. Surely an Ashwell rediscovery would be possible if it was easier to reprint her work.
Placing Coordinates
First published in the May 1966 issue of Analog Science Fiction, which is not on the Archive but which can be found on Luminist. It was soon reprinted in World’s Best Science Fiction: 1967 (ed. Terry Carr and Donald Wolheim), and later anthologized in the dinosaur-themed collections Behold the Mighty Dinosaur (ed. David Jablonski) and The Science Fictional Dinosaur (ed. Martin H. Greenberg, Robert Silverberg, and Charles G. Waugh). This shouldn’t come as a surprise, but these are all out of print. The messed up part is that “The Wings of a Bat” might be Ashwell’s most reprinted story, given that the competition is not stiff.
Enhancing Image
We’re down for our second dinosaur story this month, although it’d be more accurate to call it dinosaur-adjacent since pterosaurs are not dinosaurs. I was surprised to find that at no point (to my recollection) does the narrator of the story call the Pteranodon at its center a dinosaur, since that would’ve been (and still is) a common mistake to make. Consider, for one, how a dromaeosaur (or raptor) has more in common with a chicken than a pterosaur, the latter being a flying reptile and an evolutionary dead end. We don’t actually see any dinosaurs in the story itself, although they do get mentioned, making this a tenuous piece of dinosaur media. We get a couple mentions of certain prehistoric animals too, but thankfully Ashwell does not go deep into details, lest the story age woefully.
Where are we? More importantly, when are we? It’s the Cretaceous, and we follow a team of colonists in a mining camp—not mining the land but the waters of the island. The narrator (whose name I don’t think we get) is on paper a doctor assigned to the camp but who in practice spends much more of his time working on the camp’s newspaper—with a readership of less than thirty people. Doc (as I’ll call him from now on) is, like everyone else on the island, very short (the tallest person is 5’7″, as company-mandated), and does not have a soft spot for local wildlife. The location? Lake Possible, a sort of Loch Ness where prehistoric life really had taken over, although curiously, like I said, we do not encounter any dinosaurs directly.
Indeed, unlike most dinosaur media involving humans, the campers are not so concerned with being hunted by predators, but instead focus on their work and try to get along with each other. Conflict in introduced when Henry, a very young co-worker of Doc’s, brings in a wounded baby pterosaur, much to Doc’s distress; for one he’s a people doctor and not a veterinarian, but he also holds a grudge against pterosaurs. “I maintain that my attitude was not unreasonable, or even unkind. I knew no more about the treatment of sick pterodactyls than Henry did—if anything, less.” Had Doc been a veterinarian he might’ve written the pterosaur off as a losst cause, but with a combination of hope and ignorance he takes the fledgling in, first getting her (for it’s identifiably a her I suppose) to eat—not very successfully. This is where the pterosaurs-are-just-scaly-birds things comes into play, with truth be told is the only thing that struck me as overtly anachronistic; mind you, I say this ias an enthusiastic layman and not an expert.
We know now that pterosaurs and birds, while they were contemporaneous and to some degree related to dinosaurs (the birds being directly related to theropods), did not have a lot in common. Fiona, as the baby Pteranodon comes to be called, proves to be resourceful, but the thrust of the narrative is essentially one where a human nurses a baby bird back to health; in reality a baby Pteranodon would’ve probably been even more independent, being able to fly and fend for itself at a very young age. As it is much of the story is concerned with Doc and company working out a way to feed Fiona and later getting her to use her wings. There’s a certain saying that it takes a village to raise a child, and that’s basically true with raising Fiona, which turns out to be a multi-person endeavor. Still, Doc got the ball rolling.
You may wonder why, feeling as I did, I allowed myself to get stuck with the brute. The explanation, though complicated, can be given in one word: Morale. It’s a tricky thing in any community. When twenty-nine people make up the total population of the world and will for the next nine years, it’s the most important thing of all.
Of course the unspoken other reason for Doc agreeing to take care of Fiona is that he’s becoming slowly fond of her, but thankfully the narration does not push this to the forefront. I know that I’m describing “The Wings of a Bat” in such a way that one could think of it as a sappy yarn about some grumpy guy who learns that children are cool and yadda yadda, but trust me, this could be so much sappier. It works, I think, primarily because Doc, for all his capacity to do good, is not a sentimental person; like a lot of real doctors he cares about the lives of others but is not what we’d call an empath. Leonard McCoy he is not quite. Despite the lack of sentimentalism, the momentum of the narration is impressive, with Ashwell taking a bit after fellow British author Eric Frank Russell in that she conveys an energy that could be mistaken for American brashness.
“The Wings of a Bat” is billed as a novelette, but it reads as shorter because Ashwell deals out information at an almost perfect pace—I say “almost” because she does faulter slightly in the last quarter or so, when she apparently felt obligated to inject some “action” into the narrative. This is a story that starts stronger than it ends, but it maintains a youthful lust for the wonders of life that border on cinematic. Not that this would ever happen, but I can imagine a live-action movie adaptation (maybe a short film) that uses mainly puppetry and animatronics to bring Fiona to life—or, as an alternative, motion capture wherein a person, mimicking what might’ve been a pterosaur’s movements on land, is CG’d over. Even something on this humble a scale can charge the imagination in such a way.
There Be Spoilers Here
Unfortunately and without warning, Fiona does leave the nest, so to speak. More importantly, there comes the possibility of a storm—even a hurricane—that could put the whole mining expedition in jeopardy. The camp’s meteorologist falls ill, and somebody has to head out and get her weather readings for her. (We can send people back a hundred million years but evidently our weather machinery can only be so advanced.) Why Doc of all people has to be the one do this is a little arbitrary, but then without it we wouldn’t have an “explosive” climax—although we didn’t need one, this being my only real issue with the story. During his expedition Doc comes across a rather nosey Pteranodon, which of course is supposed to be Fiona but which Doc is unsure about. “This creature was about twice as large as she’d been when I loosed her. Would Fiona be full grown now? I hadn’t the slightest idea.” Oh I think you do, Doc! Henry supposes that Fiona, now grown up, either thinks herself as like a human or thinks of her human foster family as like pterosaurs. Ultimately Doc accepts the reunion.
The ending is a bittersweet one. We never see Fiona again, and her fate is left uncertain; but the camp is left mostly intact and Doc himself was apparently shielded by the now-grown Pteranodon during the storm. The newspaper Doc runs changes its name to include pterosaur-watching. Well that’s sweet. It took me two and a half days to read this one, which normally sounds bad, but in the case of “The Wings of a Bat” my schedule was cluttered and the time I had to read the story I wanted to savor. The last quarter of it is the weakest part (though the ending itself is nice), but it’s still well-paced enough that I didn’t feel my time was being wasted. What I liked so much about “Unwillingly to School,” namely its punchiness and eagerness to suck the reader into a place and particular character’s mindset (never mind that said character has a disability and she does not constantly hate herself for it), is shown here as well. Doc himself is implied to live with dwarfism, and he very much strikes me as (in the hypothetical movie adaptation) being played by Peter Dinklage. By story’s end I feel like I got live on Lake Possible and its environs, despite sparce descriptions of the wildlife and most of the campers being unnamed. Ashwell has the magic touch.
A Step Farther Out
Did not age as much as I had expected; granted, this is partly due to the aforementioned lack of details given about life in the Cretaceous. Ashwell’s style is also about as spritely and youthful as I had expected, despite her being deep in her thirties at this point and writing for the most conservative magazine in the field. I think people act disappointed with Analog in the last years of John W. Campbell’s editorship because he was still capable of backing strong material, and “The Wings of a Bat” is one example. I can see how one’s interest would wane a bit in the last section, once the “action” kicks in and the doctor’s relationship with the other campers and Fiona takes sort of a back seat, but it’s still short enough that my attention span was not tested. This is, despite the prospect of a cute baby pterodactyl, not the excercise in sentimentality I might’ve assumed. Hell, I can see this working as a movie. Just remember that pterosaurs are not dinosaurs!
See you next time.
-
The Observatory: Jurassic Park and the Promise of Science Fiction

(From Jurassic Park, 1993.) Contains spoilers for a movie that is not only three decades old but one of the most famous movies of all time.
I’ve written about Jurassic Park before, which funnily enough makes it hard for me to figure out how to start this month’s editorial. Choosing the topic was also easy, considering the film’s 30th anniversary was this month, but I also kept searching for some excuse to not write about it; again, it would not be my first rodeo. This is how it is with your first love—with the thing that’s been more or less consistently a part of your makeup since the days when you still believed Santa Claus was real. Only a few works of art can lay claim to influencing how you would perceive other works of art for the rest of your life, and while these don’t necessarily come along in your formative years, being very young certainly helps. I’m pretty sure I saw Jurassic Park for the first time when I was all of three years old and since then I’ve watched it at least once a year. Hell, I saw it twice in theaters (once in 2D and once in 3D) during its 20th anniversary theatrical rerelease.
2013 is already a long time ago.
I don’t talk about movies much here, because this is mainly a literature blog, but I’ve seen a lot of movies (you can see this for yourself on my Letterboxd page); with that said, I still feel weird when I tell people Jurassic Park is my favorite movie. People tend to be very defensive and nostalgic about their favorite movies unless they’re the type to succumb to recency bias. (I know you love Everything Everywhere All at Once, but you should probably let that opinion sit and marinate for a while before telling people it’s your favorite movie ever.) I know people who will swear by movies that I personally don’t care for, but it’s hard (not to mention wrong) to knock passion for a work of art. I know people whose brain chemistry was changed irreversibly when they watched The Matrix for the first time back in 1999, and I know from experience that Jurassic Park had a similar effect on people. No movie in history has inspired more people to become paleontologists than this one. Despite its technophobia (which I’ll get to in a minute), Jurassic Park is about as convincing an argument for the wonders of science as any book written by the likes of Stephen Hawking or Carl Sagan.
This is, of course, a movie that was primarily made to entertain people; it was based on a commercial SF novel in the “technothriller” mode by one Michael Crichton, whose influence on people’s understanding of SF is actually quite understated despite his popularity. Even though Crichton has now been dead for 15 years his ghost continues to haunt even supposedly cerebral SF now being produced, with the much lawded (though, having seen the first season, I was less impressed) show Westworld sharing the basic premise with Crichton’s movie of the same name. Crichton’s first (and arguably best) SF novel, The Andromeda Strain, still serves as a textbook and often-cited example of the theme of man’s folly in the face of nature. Jurassic Park, the novel, reads in parts like a direct line to Crichton’s thoughts on the prospect of humanity fucking around and finding out with regards to meddling with the natural world. Crichton’s avatar, Ian Malcolm, is not a doctor like his creator, nor is he a giant (he is also, unlike both Crichton and his movie counterpart, losing his hair), but he does serve pretty blatantly as a puppet through which Crichton hares his ambivalence about genetic engineering. The cautionary tale is not an ambiguous one.
The novel, published in 1990, was optioned for a movie adaptation before it even saw release, and Steven Spielberg hopped right on it. Spielberg has been, for about half a century now, the biggest architect of people’s cinematic imaginings whose name is not George Lucas, and like Lucas his fondness for science fiction is unmistakable. He did not officially direct an SF movie until Close Encounters of the Third Kind in 1977, but Spielberg’s career from the outset was informed by genre maestros, not least of these being Rod Serling, whose Night Gallery a very young Spielberg worked on, and Richard Matheson, who wrote the screenplay (not to mention the short story) for Duel, Spielberg’s directorial debut. At first glance Crichton and Spielberg seem like they would make an odd couple, given the former’s pessimism and the latter’s notorious optimism, but they’re both undoubtedly gifted entertainers and they both see science fiction as a means to that end. A collaboration between the two was almost inevitable.
For Jurassic Park the film, Crichton co-wrote the screenplay with David Koepp, although from what I can tell Koepp did most of the heavy lifting in turning Crichton’s rather gory novel into a family-friendly script. Koepp, when he was on the ball, had an almost supernatural talent for writing blockbuster scripts that were just intelligent enough while being perfectly structured so as to keep audiences engaged. (Forgive me for using the past tense as if Koepp were dead when in reality he is very much alive, if over the hill.) This may sound controversial, but I think Jurassic Park is one of those film adaptations that largely improves on the source material (with a few concessions made), such that it holds up better overall. I still have a deep fondness for the novel, though I would say The Andromeda Strain and Sphere come closer to being Crichton’s best; it’s more that the novel is weighed down by copious amounts of exposition, along with Malcolm being the type to preach endlessly. Malcolm, on top of being blessed with an all-timer performance by Jeff Goldblum, is made less preachy and abrasive (if also not as clear in regards to his plot relevance) for the film.
The film was shot in the summer of 1992 and finished filming ahead of schedule, despite some issues with the effects. Spielberg originally envisioned the dinosaurs as being animated via stop-motion, but they could not get the dinosaurs to look “realistic” no matter how fluidly animated. Ultimately the stop-motion effects would serve as a useful blueprint for what would turn out to be mostly a mix of puppetry and animatronics, with some computer-generated effects sprinkled in when nothing else would do. The film would be (and still is) remembered as revolutionizing CGI, but the truth is that CGI played a very small part in the final product. The dinosaurs themselves only have something like just under 20 minutes of screentime, a good portion of which is devoted to the T. rex breakout scene, and only a small fraction of that time involves computer effects. The most impressive effect is arguably the fully constructed T. rex animatronic, which can be seen at certain points and which is seamlessly intermingled with CG shots.
More important than seeing dinosaurs, however, is the idea of seeing dinosaurs, and this is where the real magic of Jurassic Park comes into play. Surely this film would not have won three Oscars (plus a Hugo for Best Dramatic Pressentation) and kicked off a perpetually lucrative franchise had it been a two-hour snoozefest with the occasional dinosaur jumping out of a closet. Despite the relatively sparse dino action, the film remains consistently provocative and entertaining. While some critics faulted it upon release for its lack of human drama, the human characters are certainly memorable in their own right, with some of the finest character actors in the industry at the time being recruited: Jeff Goldblum, Richard Attenborough, Samuel L. Jackson, Wayne Knight, Laura Dern, and the criminally underrated Sam Neill, among others. There is a genuine sense of awe when the visitors see a brachiosaurus for the first time—not just because the effects are convincing but also because the actors seem as star-struck as the audience. Ignoring the scientific inaccuracies (we know, for instance, that brachiosaurs did not have teeth), this was the first time moviegoers saw a sauropod that looked and acted like it could be the real thing.
There’s a certain long-running phrase in SF circles that, despite being around for decades and regarded by many as a cliche, has yet to have its stock value plummet: I’m of course talking about “sense of wonder.” SF as a genre can be said to have a special advantage over other genres in that it cranks out more “sense of wonder” moments than any other by far: the stargate in 2001: A Space Odyssey, the giant alien corpse with its chest opened in Alien, Neo dodging slow-motion bullets in The Matrix, the color palette changing as Our Heroess™ enter the Zone in Stalker. Those are just some movie examples, by the way. What exactly is sense of wonder? It seems impossible to quantify, which is probably true, and as such it’s hard to come up with a clean definition, although people know it when they see it. I think of sense of wonder as this: the sensation of opening a door to somewhere you’ve never been before. There is the sense, possibly a mix of joy and anxiety, of sailing into uncharted waters. Science fiction is my favorite genre in part because it’s the most wondrous genre; sense of wonder is its trade.
A work of science fiction need not be a masterpiece to have a great sense-of-wonder moment, since these are ultimately moments and not necessarily indicative of the whole picture, but it’s telling of Jurassic Park‘s magic that it has not one but several of these moments. The visitors seeing their first brachiosaurus is one example, as is (in a darker hue) the T. rex breaking out of its enclosure; then there’s the realization that, due to an oversight with what species of frog is being spliced with dinosaur DNA to fill the sequence gaps, the dinosaurs are actually transsexual and able to reproduce on their own. (That’s right, the movie said trans dinosaur rights.) In the book there’s a sense of foreboding with how the park has totally lost control of the thread, but in the movie this is somewhat replaced by a sense of amazement. Life had found a way, even against human-imposed limitationss. Ultimately it’s still a “man fucks around with nature and finds out” narrative, but Crichton’s pessimism has been downplayed in favor of wonderment at the possibilities of the natural world—to the movie’s benefit.
You could say that’s the promise of science fiction: the possibility of doors to things never seen before being opened. For any SF fan there comes a point, probably early in life, when some work of the genre just so happens to come along and make the promise that this is what science fiction is about and this is what science fiction is capable of doing. The work in question need not be of Shakespearean complexity, nor so involved in the depths of the human spirit, but it does offer an example of something that science fiction does more so than its brethren. I’m sure if you went back to the early 20th century you could find people who were inspired to persue some career path or to take up some social justice cause, or to even become SF writers themselves, because they read H. G. Wells’s The Time Machine when they were kids. God knows I became first enamored with SF as a genre of literature when I read Wells and Crichton in middle school, then later Philip K. Dick. But when I was a kid a certain door had been opened to me, with a certain movie promising me that this is what science fiction can do.
The promise is still being kept.
-
Serial Review: Sos the Rope by Piers Anthony (Part 3/3)

(Cover by Chesley Bonestell. F&SF, September 1968.) Who Goes There?
Maybe Piers Anthony hits the spot if you’re really horny and/or are not a very discerning reader; in other words, if you’re in your teens. I am very much not in my teens anymore (although some of my peers would say 27 is still babby) so Anthony’s writing just kind of osculates between boring and repulsive for me. I hear Macroscope is supposed to be good but that’s one novel from an author who has, over the course of six decades, written dozens—many of them series entries. Speaking of which, Sos the Rope is the first entry in the Battle Circle trilogy, and having just finished the last installment I can see how it would lend itself to a sequel—not that I wanna read more. I was awfully slow finishing this, not because it was a difficult read exactly but because I didn’t like it and I kept putting it off.
Placing Coordinates
Part 3 was published in the September 1968 issue of The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction. You can find used copies of the Battle Circle trilogy as an omnibus if you feel like it.
Enhancing Image
First things first, I cannot tell if there was a printing error in Part 2 or if Anthony somehow forgot to write a whole scene, but the recap section of Part 3 tells us about something that we are straight-up not told about in the previous installment. Last time, you may recall, Sos and Sol enter the battle circle to see who gets Sola and Soli, Sol’s wife and daughter (by way of adoption) respectively, and that is where it ended. We were not told the outcome of the fight at the end of Part 2 (indeed it ended just as the fight was about to start), but before we get to Part 3 proper we’re told that Sos had lost his fight with Sol. I was greatly confused becausse it made me think that I had somehow forgotten what had happened at the end of Part 2, but no, I did not miss anything; we’re just told about a scene in the recap that we did not get to read for ourselves. This is clearly bullshit.
Anyway, Sos lost the fight OFFSCREEN and now, in shame, he goes to “the mountain” to commit ritual suicide. I feel for him. His pet bird Stupid (still not funny) stays with him out of loyalty and sadly freezes to death as they climb the mountain, although Sos himself ultimately just loses consciousness before being rescued. It’s here that we’re introduced to the ssecond major female character of the novel and yet another reminder that Anthony cannot write about women for shit. I’m calling her Sosa now as opposed to later for the sake of my sanity, because you guessed it, she does not have a name at first. Sosa is a very short but very athletic woman who challenges Sos to be his wife, stealing his bracelet and making him work for it. I have nothing against short girls, but I have a creeping suspicion of what Anthony is trying when he repeatedly describes her as childlike and “Elfin,” and I don’t like it. I don’t like fanservice when it’s this creepy and manipulative.
Gonna go on two rants for the price of one here. The first is that I still can’t get over how fucking stupid the naming convention in this novel is. Women do not have names unless they have a husband, whereupon they take the husband’s name, just slightly altered. Is it patriarchal that the custom for marriage in Anglosphere involves the woman taking the man’s last name? Yes, but at last the woman had a name of her own to begin with. How would anything get done in the world of the novel if half the adult population is nameless and presumably unable to own or transfer property? We are told, of course, that things aren’t the same everywhere—that, for instance, things in South America are apparently not as dire; with that said, we’re given such a dim picture of life in this post-nuclear future that it actually strains one’s suspension of disbelief. I know the idea is that “the Blast” sent mankind (at least in North America) back to the stone age, with only small pockets of civilized humanity left, but women were able to carry titles even in the time of Richard III. This future society is untenable, which seems to be the point somewhat, but it’s also utterly implausible.
The other thing is that even if we’re to put the mechanics of the novel’s world aside, Anthony’s third-person narration cannot help but exhibit a profound distrust of women that goes beyond world-building. I sometimes wonder if I’m too easy on misogynistic writing in old-timey SFF, or if young readers are too harsh about such a matter; it’s fine, everyone has a different threshold. With that said, Anthony crosses my threshold repeatedly, to the point where I’m not sure what a defense of it is supposed to sound like. Early on Sos ponders what would’ve happened had that bitch Sola not entered the picture and complicated his totally platonic relationship with Sol, not even Sola in particular but the idea that a woman ruined everything. “It was not the particular girl that mattered, but her presence at the inception.” I wonder if people who complain about Robert Heinlein’s sexism (which is certainly valid to criticize, mind you) would survive if they encountered Anthony. I personally can’t stand this shit; I think it’s grotesque.
Anyway, we’re at the “hero’s lowest point” part of the narrative and so Sos, now weaponless (oh right, he gave up the rope as the result of losing his fight with Sol, ALSO SOMETHING WE WERE NOT TOLD ABOUT UNTIL AFTER THE FACT), has to regain confidence
by fucking the shit out of Sosa, now his wifeby getting to know the people of “the mountain,” which are not exactly crazies but who are considerably more civilized than the nomads who roam the wasteland. Sosa and others convince Sos he has to head back down the mountain, to “come back from the dead” as it were, and claim his spot as the true leader of Sol’s empire. Keep in mind that Part 3 is about twice the length of Part 2 and that despite the difference in length there’s about as much plot meat on the story’s bones; in other words there’s a lot of (bad) dialogue and not much real action here.There Be Spoilers Here
Sos returns and meets up with some of his former homies, having done something I honestly would’ve expected to have seen earlier: go full barbarian class and adopt fists as his weapon in the battle circle. It’s a gamble, but after training Sos is really able to kick ass in the circle, gaining tribes and chipping away at Sol’s ground one battle at a time. Why Sos feels the need to do all this is not made clear, even to himself, which is something Anthony will probably elaborate on in the sequels but which I fortunately don’t have to get into. Sos’s biggest challenge once again is Bog, the big dumb club-swinger from before, who remains the best character simply by virtue of the fact that he likes hitting things and does not care about the big picture. Unfortunately their fight does not go how Sos had wanted and he ends up injuring Bog irreparably by breaking his neck accidentally. “If he survived it would be as a paralytic.” So Bog gets mercy killed.
Sos then narrowly beats Sol in their rematch, with Sol giving Sola over to Sos (as the two are still in love, God knows why) but keeping Soli. Father and daughter wander to the mountain where they may or may not be taking in by the people there. Sos thinks Sosa (whom he had left behind) will gladly accept Soli as an adopted daughter, but I have my doubts. Now if thousands of men at his disposal, both in name and in fact, Sos figuratively looks to the horizon and wonders if this empire of his will prove to save humanity or repeat the old mistakes—if he is “the hero, or the villain.” I mean clearly the villain here is Piers Anthony, but who am I to judge. The back end of Part 3 was a breezy read for me if only because the fight scenes kept going in one ear and out the other, as it were. It could just be that my deep ambivalence to the characters and nature of the novel’s world made the action uninteresting, but if I had a watch I would’ve been glancing at it.
A Step Farther Out
Can I go home now?
Thus far Sos the Rope is the worst thing I’ve reviewed for this site, narrowly beating out Lovecraft’s “The Dreams in the Witch-House” because of the length and because its woman-hating is so rabid. There are many bad serials out there, though, and covering one of those turkeys was inevitable. I went in hoping the experience would change my mind about Anthony and I have to say it really did not. For better or worse the next two entries in the Battle Circle trilogy did not see magazine publication, which means I don’t have an excuse to cover them here or to read them ever. Unfortunately, because Anthony did have a few other novels serialized early in his career, I’ll be at some point compelled (or rather coerced) to cover those…
See you next time.
-
Novella Review: “Time Safari” by David Drake

(Cover artist uncredited. Destinies, August 1981.) Who Goes There?
I don’t know much about David Drake, although if you browse enough of Baen Books you’ll find him a familiar name before long. Drake was one of the original Baen regulars, appearing in the ’70s when Jim Baen was editor of Galaxy Science Fiction, then later became a regular author and editor at Baen Books. As you can guess, Drake is a Vietnam war veteran (he was in the army, specifically) and this experience, like with certain other SF authors of his generation (looking at you, Joe Haldeman), very much informed his writing. Historically Drake is of fine importance as he was one of the pioneers of military SF as we now recognize it. “Time Safari,” while not military SF exactly, does evoke imagery from a certain war.
Placing Coordinates
First published in the August 1981 issue of Destinies, which is on the Archive. You may notice a discrepancy: the people over at the Archive have it listed as the Spring 1981 issue. Truth is that this, the last issue of Destinies, is undated, but the people at ISFDB have it listed as August and, given that’s the month of publication inside the issue itself, I’m going with that; mind you, ISFDB classifies Destinies as an anthology series when really it’s a magazine that simply has an unusual format. Destinies was Baen’s first (and apparently most successful) attempt at a “paperback magazine,” a mass market paperback that has the contents of a magazine, including an editorial, a science department, a book review column, etc., and it even has issue numbers. Anyway, you can find “Time Safari” in the collection of the same name, as well as a few others, most recently the Drake collection Dinosaurs & a Dirigible; and yes, that last one is a Baen publication.
Enhancing Image
The cast of “Time Safari” is a bit crowded, so I’ll get names out of the way first before we get into the action. You basically have the safari staff and the tourists, with the important members of the former being Henry Vickers, Our Hero™, and Don Washman, a helicopter pilot; for the tourists we have the McPhersons, who are siblings and whose first names I don’t think we even get, and then the big ones, Jonathan and Adrienne Salmes, one of the bitterest married couples in all of fiction. The Salmes are a double-edged sword in that they’re more or less responsible for the plot (no Salmes, no story), but I also have issues with how Drake writes them. There’s a lot to say about some of these characters, good and bad.
The premise of “Time Safari” was not new, even in 1981; certain readers may recall L. Sprague de Camp’s “A Gun for Dinosaur” and Brian Aldiss’s “Poor Little Warrior!” from the ’50s, and there are probably examples from even earlier that I can’t think of right now. The idea of going back in time to hunt dinosaurs is basic, arguably problematic, and yet it’s a well that has been returned to again and again over the decades—I suspect because, while it doesn’t challenge the mind, it does lend itself to entertainment. The time travel project at the heart of “Time Safari” is backed by the Israeli government, and I can at least appreciate the move to make said government come off as a little shady. Totally unrelated, but I have to wonder if Vickers (who, mind you, is an American expat) would be as comfortable to work under
a more overtly fascistBen Netanyahu.Vickers himself is a bit of an anti-hero. By his own admission he would’ve been trading ivory in darkest Africa had he lived in the 19th century, and surely the phantom of imperialism goes a way to explain his contentment to deal with whiny upper-class customers in the jungles of the Cretaceous. Of course, basically working in customer service myself, I’m inclined to sympathize with Vickers despite some rather questionable decisions he makes later in the story. Sad the same can’t be said for literally any other character. The McPhersons are fine I guess, but they’re a two-for-one deal and frankly it’s easy to get the two confused. The gunners (there are, if I remember right, two guides, two pilots, and two gunners on the staff) are mostly there to act as boisterous assholes, and the guides and pilots are there to act as Clement-esque figures of reason.
There’s a whole lot of explaining in this novella.
But then there are the Salmes. Jonathan is bad news for everybody pretty much every time he shows up, and he almost certainly suffers from some unnamed mental illness; his wife is not a whole lot better. Adrienne, who unlike her husband seems in total control of her mental faculties, gets the ball rolling by humiliating her husband in front of the whole safari group, being pretty open about the fact that she’s an adulterer. Now, I’m by no means one of those puritans who thinks adultery is a crime, but it’s more that Adrienne’s treatment of her husband is so obviously abusive that the fact that she never gets held accountable for this is a bit troubling. I’m getting ahead of myself here, but Adrienne is the closest the story has to a villain, although strangely Drake does not frame her as being thus.
I guess the more immediate problem is that Jonathan is a cuck with a screw loose who is both a coward and desperate to prove his wife wrong. “But Vickers was irritated to realize that it also bothered him that Don Washman and Mrs. Salmes seemed to be getting along very well together.” Maybe you can see where this is going. The interpersonal drama is the heart of “Time Safari,” which I guess makes sense since this is a 30,000-word novella and we can’t just have dinosaur-hunting action (although that does take up a good portion of the word count), but what holds me back from enjoying it more is that the characters are, by and large, both unlikable and unrelatable. No, I’m not saying every character in a work of fiction has to be a beacon of morality or that a character’s motives have to be totally understandable; it’s more that if you want readers to get invested in your love pentagon or whatever that they ought to get invested in the characters first.
A word on the mechanics of time travel as presented here. This is a case of being able to travel into the past but not into the future; there are no encounters with Eloi and Morlocks, sadly. The safari enters the Cretaceous via an insersion vehicle, a convoluted setup involving a helicopter for airborne shooting plus a couple of “ponies,” which are basically small tanks that can also serve as watercraft. Why the Cretaceous? My guess is that it was the period home to the biggest land carnivores the world has ever seen, plus sauropods in certain part of the world; and yes, we have a tyrannosaur. I say “tyrannosaur” because I don’t think we get a T. rex proper here, but rather a “gorgosaur,” a smaller cousin to the T. rex. Drake uses certain names for dinosaurs which probably referred to specific species circa 1980 but which now read as confusing, due to advances in our undertanding of dinosaurs. As is often the case with dinosaur media, carnivores (especially large theropods) are overrepresented, to the point where there seems to be a carnivore-herbivore imbalance. We have a few tyrannosaurs (which is more than I was expecting) but we also have a pack of “dromaeosaurs,” which we know to be raptors—although they’re not Velociraptors, of course.
Being that this piece of dinosaur media is now four decades old, be prepares for some rather gross inaccuracies. The interiors (the illustrator for “Time Safari” is sadly uncredited) give very much the impression of dinosaurs in the pre-Jurassic Park mode, i.e., as swamp creatures, with theropods being drawn as having upright statures as opposed to the far more practical horizontal orientation of the spine that would become mainstream with Jurassic Park. At the very least Drake does depict the tyrannosaur as a carnivore that would recognize, and probably get most of its nutrition from, carrion. We also get ceratopsians, although not the Triceratops specifically (it’s a Torosaurus if I remember right). We even get a prehistoric crocodile, which like everything else is fucking massive, althoughin terms of physiology it’s very similar to modern crocodiles; be sure to put a pin in this last one.
There Be Spoilers Here
Everything goes to shit when Jonathan Salmes sabotages the helicopter, upon discovering Adrienne’s affair with Washman, and later steals the insersion vehicle—at the cost of his own life. The back end of the story sees Vickers, Adrienne, and Washman separated from the rest of the team as they have to deal with a wrecked chopper, a pissed tyrannosaur, and a good deal of FIRE. Adrienne doesn’t find out about Jonathan’s death until later and it’s not even directly brought up in the short epilogue, which I thought was conspicuous. Vickers and Adrienne have to drag around an injured Washman as they get back to base, where along the way the two get into a weird and not totally convincing affair of their own—not helped by the fact that Washman is RIGHT THERE (albeit unconscious) the whole time. That Adrienne is a terrible person gives Vickers some pause but he relents on the grounds that, despite her bitchery, Adrienne is shockingly good at taking care of herself in the wild. I can’t say I buy Drake’s attempt at making Adrienne appear to be less of a shitty person than she really is.
We actually get two deus ex machinas for the price of one in the climax, as the tyrannosaur that’s been going after the trio gets fucking wrecked by a crocodile that nearly dwarfs it in size. (Well you know what they say, there’s always a bigger fish…) The second and slightly more ludicrous deus ex machina comes when the insersion vehicle gets returned to where it was before, despite Vickers being convinced that you can’t return exactly to the time and place where you last jumped off—something that was vaguely alluded to early in the story but which more feels like a rabbit that Drake has pulled out of a hat. By this point Vickers and Adrienne have taken a liking to each other; if I was in Vickers’s position I would decline, if only because Adrienne’s late husband met a very bad end and, truth be told, I get black widow vibes from her. Still, despite a couple deaths (which I feel like would involve a lot of red tape, but Drake bypasses this), the safari team is rescued and Vickers and Adrienne volunteer to be guinea pigs for the Israeli government’s time travel shenanigans—which I assume is what turns this into an episodic series, but I’m not sure.
A Step Farther Out
I’m curious about reading more Drake, but weirdly I’m not so curious about checking out more of this series in particular. True, the kid in me goes apeshit for anything dinosaur-related by default (even bad and/or woefully outdated dinosaur media), but “Time Safari” is not how I would’ve handled the material personally. If Drake had written his human characters with more empathy I think it would’ve improved the story considerably. If you want dinosaur-hunting action then chunks of the novella will scratch that itch, but it’s also lacking in that sense-of-wonder touch that defines so much of dinosaur media—I suspect intentionally, except that it doesn’t quite venture into the nihilism of, say, Aldiss’s “Poor Little Warrior!” Speaking of which, Aldiss’s story got its point across in half a dozen pages, whereas I do think Drake could’ve streamlined “Time Safari,” namely its cast of characters, and made it a shorter, punchier novella.
See you next time.
-
Serial Review: Sos the Rope by Piers Anthony (Part 2/3)

(Cover by Gahan Wilson. F&SF, August 1968.) Who Goes There?
To give Piers Anthony some credit, I’m sure he’s written something good, given he’s been writing continuously for about 60 years now; you know the thing about stopped clocks. With that said I can’t bring myself to read a great deal of Anthony. The last time (actually it was also the first time) I had read Anthony was his 1972 short story “In the Barn,” which was a few years ago and which put me off from reading more Anthony for that span of time. I hear Macroscope is supposed to be good…
Placing Coordinates
Part 2 was published in the August 1968 issue of The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction. I can’t tell if it’s in print or not, but used paperback copies are easy to find. For the morbidly curious, the whole trilogy (all three novels being mercifully short) can be found easily as an omnibus. Why someone would want this is beyond me.
Enhancing Image
As you know I didn’t like Part 1, but I’ll admit Part 2 is an improvement—partly because it’s much shorter. Not much happens and there’s not a lot for me to talk about, so this review will be just as succinct. Last time
on Dragon Ball Zwe had Sol enter the battle circle in an effort to recruit Bog, a big dumb brute who has impressive stamina and is real mean with the club. The match ends in a draw and Bog chooses to not join Sol’s tribe; he simply likes to fight people in the circle for the fun of it. Bog is dumber than a bag of hammers but he’s still the most relatable character in the novel. Sos will run into Bog much later (in the installment) after a time-skip and it’ll be the most enjoyable sequence in Part 2. Did I say “enjoyable”…?Why yes, Part 2 is, surprisingly, not constant pain and suffering; this is due largely to the absence of Sola, who does not reappear until towards the end (regrettably but inevitably) of this installment. Indeed women are mostly absent from the narrative at this point, which is great because Anthony is about as good at writing women as John F. Kennedy was at staying faithful to his wife. The trio that defined Part 1 has dispersed, with Sos reaching the end of his one-year “contract” with Sol and splitting off from the tribe. To do what? Not really sure. He comes to a crazy-run hospital and has a chat with one Dr. Jones, who by all appearances is a normal modern-day doctor. We find out that Sol was an orphan and that he is in fact a eunuch, not that these fact change anything profoundly. It’s here that Sos also finally gets the bright idea to take on a new weapon, and you can guess what it is.
Sos, previously weaponless and bitchless, decides to adopt the rope as his new weapon; it’s not conventional but it functions similarly to the whip, which Dr. Jones points out as a viable offensive tool. “That day Sos gained a weapon—but it was five months before he felt proficient enough with it to undertake the trail again.” That’s right, we get another time-skip! The pacing in this installment is a little too fast if anything, to the point where I struggle to get invested in what’s happening; there’s so little time to get attached to characters and action. The speed at which Anthony pushes the plot forward reminds me, as someone who’s written fanfiction (don’t ask for what) in his time, of competent but underwritten adventure fanfiction you’d find on AO3. The wish-fulfillment element doesn’t help.
Dr. Jones brings up something I had thought of before but which the world of the novel seemingly did not have an answer for, which is the fact that even in the sword family there are many distinct types of sword that require different technique and levels of physicality. Someone who kicks ass with a broadsword may not be so effective with a rapier. Thus Sos uses this loophole to adopt such a niche tool as the rope for his new weapon. What if someone were to use a shield as their weapon of choice? Random thought. The shield is known mainly for defense but it could also serve as a gnarly weapon in a pinch, especially depending on the materials of the shield. I wanna be more interested in the mechanics of the novel’s world-building than I actually am, saying this as a bit of a Dark Souls fan. I’m just saying if combat is the focal point of your story, whether it be literature or a video game, you should put more thought and energy into making that compelling.
There Be Spoilers Here
Eventually Sos runs into Bog again and they have their own match, mainly to test Sos’s proficiency with his set of rope; it’s another draw! Then Bog watches cartoons on a TV set; this is the best part of the installment. Then we’re finally reunited with Sol and Sola… sort of. Sola had gotten pregnant with Sos’s kid at the end of Part 1, and well, it’s been over a year since that happened. It’s a baby girl and her name is Soli. Cute. One problem: even though Sol is perfectly fin with Sos taking Sola as his wife (he’s actually quite happy to get cucked like that), he wants to keep Soli. Admirable that Sol wants to raise a child as a single parents, and it’s not even technically his, but the question is: who does Soli belong to, her mom or her “legal” dad? I feel like this whole situation would be solved with polygamy, what with Sos and Sol respecting each other a great deal and certainly the three of them would agree to share. But oh well, we need drama…
What’s to become of the baby? Will Sos and Sol’s friendship end over this dilemma? Should we care? Stay tuned to find out!
A Step Farther Out
See you next time.
-
Serial Review: Sos the Rope by Piers Anthony (Part 1/3)

(Cover by Jack Gaughan. F&SF, July 1968.) Who Goes There?
Piers Anthony is a totally uncontroversial and universally beloved author whose genre fiction, often aimed at a younger audience, has inspired generations of readers with wholesome Christian values. Whereas some fantasy authors are content to rely on gore and fanservice to boost sales, Anthony, in the more than half-century that he’s been active, would surely never stoop so low as to pander to a horny and passively misogynistic base of teen boys with boobs as the carrot at the end of the stick!
I cannot keep doing this.
Look, I know that for people of a certain age (i.e., people old enough to have bought Titanic on VHS), Anthony may or may not have been a part of their formative years as young impressionable readers—ya know, when they were not old enough to have acquired taste yet. With that said I have to wonder how promising a guy can be whose books have such lovely titles as Roc and a Hard Place (very funny, Piers) and The Color of Her Panties (I feel dirty just for typing this one). And then there’s the one ecounter I had with Anthony prior to all this, which was “In the Barn,” his story for Again, Dangerous Visions, one of the most disgusting pieces of writing I’ve ever come across. I’ve read Blood Meridian and American Psycho, and I will gladly take those (which are, after all, pretty great novels) over “In the Barn.” When something is compared to “In the Barn” it should serve as your cue to run in the opposite direction. Not a great first impression.
Sos the Rope was Anthony’s second novel, and by this point he was a Hugo finalist for his first novel, Chthon, which everyone I know loathes; well somebody must’ve liked it. I try to be the optimist, but assuming the quality doesn’t change then Sos the Rope looks to be the first bad serial I’ve covered for this site, which I get was inevitable; there are more bad serials than good. Oh, but how bad can it be? It’s not as bad as “In the Barn,” but…
Placing Coordinates
Part 1 was published in the July 1968 issue of The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction. I advise against downloading this one as for some reason the PDF compression messes up this particular issue pretty badly; so I went and used the print copy I already had! Although, as if to warn me of what I was in for, the front cover nearly completely tore off and had to be taped together. There is a somewhat recent paperback edition from Planet Stories (not the magazine), but if you’re feeling brave and wanna read the whole Battle Circle trilogy, you can! There’s an omnibus containing all three novels (which are mercifully short) and while out of print it can be found used for pretty cheap. If you daaaaare.
Enhancing Image
We start with the most confusing of dynamics, in which two men have the same name—Sol—and fight over who gets to keep the name. We have Sol the sword and Sol of all weapons, with the latter proving to be the more skilled warrior and robbing the first Sol of his name and weapon. Let’s retrace our steps a bit. In this far future, adult males in this part of the world base their livelihoods on their ability to beat others in what are called battle circles, “heart of the world’s culture.” The rules are simple: whoever gets thrown outside the circle loses. There are many reasons for these fights and indeed they mirror somewhat the duels noblemen would have in olden times, although from what I can gather fights in the battle circle tend to not be fatal. A man has his name, which apparently he can change in much the way we change shoes (put a pin in this one), and his weapon of choice, which becomes part of his name. Thus, if your weapon is the sword (never mind if it’s a short sword, long sword, etc.), your name might be Sol the sword; or in the case of the Sol who wins the fight at the story’s opening, you’re a jack of all trades who goes by Sol of all weapons.
I have too many questions, but we’ll get to some of those.
Sol, because he’s such a nice guy, not only gives the former Sol a new name but also recruits him to be his right-hand man, despite being weaponless temporarily. Sol wants to build an empire, recruiting dozens of men over a span of months to form a tribe that in time will hopefully form a new civilization; the criterion for recruits is trial by combat. The former Sol is now Sos, and the two men are quickly joined by a woman residing at the hostel they fought at, who “marries” Sol and takes on his status as well as the name of Sola, the “a” at the end denoting her as Sol’s property. There isn’t even a ceremony for a marriage; only a bracelet is required, and it can be removed presumably with the husband’s consent at any time.
Before I go on a rant about how marriage works and how women are treated in the world of the novel, I do wanna give Anthony a point for bending genres here a bit—in the spirit of Jack Vance of all people. Reading the opening stretch, you may think that Sos the Rope is a fantasy novel not too removed from the likes of Vance and Robert E. Howard, but like Vance at times it soon reveals itself to be science fiction masquerading as fantasy, the setting being a post-apocalyptic America a good century after some vague nuclear holocaust. Mankind has devolved back to the stone age, with the only spots of civilization (as far as we know) being hostels that are scattered throughout the land and which are run by “the crazies,” people who somehow are able to remember (probably by way of an oral or written tradition) what the beforetimes were like; but these people keep themselves apart from the nomads who roam the landscape alone or in small groups. The nomads themselves are good survivors but not much skilled otherwise.
Anyway, Sola iss clearly hitched to Sol for his status as future emperor and not because she magically thinks he’s a nice guy; the two do not even seem to like each other much as people, never mind as partners. Sos is frustrated by this, in part because he’s very obviously horny over Sola but is unable to bed her because to bed another man’s wife would be dishonorable. “Could sex mean so much?” A funny question! Actually I have a few questions of my own, such as: If all it takes to change partners is a changing of bracelets then how come Sos doesn’t ask Sol if they could switch up every now and again? It’s not like there’s a signed contract for the marriage. Come to think of it, given the tribal nature of so much of humanity, how come there’s no plural marriage? We have something of a love triangle here (really a lust triangle, since no reasonable person can suppose any of the three parties are in love with each other) whose tension could be resolved by Sos and Sol agreeing to share Sola—with her consent, of course. Why does Sola agree to marry Sol now and not much later when he has proven himself as a leader more? I assume this is so that she doesn’t look like even more of an opportunist than she already does, which still does not help much.
A few more questions not strictly related to the interpersonal conflict of the novel but which I think are worth asking, such as: So women, when hitched, take the names of their husbands and simply add a letter to the end. What if there was same-sex marriage? What if two men got married? Would their names change? There seems to be a pattern that all the adult males have monosyllables for names. What if two women got married? This one is doubly vexing because as far as I can make out, women literally do not have names in the world of the novel if they’re not hitched to some guy. How does that work? How would anything in the legal realm get done here? How would there be a transference of property without names or even agreement in writing? Is there such a thing as property aside from what people are able to carry on their backs? The answer to that last one is probably “no.” No wonder civilization is in ruins, without the concept of property outside the micro scale (for the socialists in the crowd who are wondering, there does not seem to be an overarching government that would allocate land) and with the vast majority of the populace being illiterate.
The misogynistic implications—no, never mind, I wouldn’t even say implications—simply the misogyny deeply embedded in the novel is impossible for me to get around, even as someone who tends to be apologetic with misogynistic writing in old SFF. I know sexism is a problem that has to be called out as such, but I also understand that people from different places and times are often writing under different personal and economic circumstances than what someone reading in [CURRENT YEAR] would have personal context for. The rampant woman-hating in Anthony’s novel is not something I can excuse because not only does it badly skew our understanding of one of the main characters but it also contributes to some incredibly sloppy worldbuilding, such that the novel is built on a shaky foundation of misogyny. Sola is the most rounded character of the trio, even more than Sos (ya know, the protagonist), but she also acts as the malicious temptress who repeatedly and not so subtly tries coaxing Sos into doing something that he’ll most likely regret.
A pet peeve I have with modern reviewers is when they seem to think that a female character being physically active in a narrative must mean then that said female character is well-written. With all due respect to these people, because some of them really are astute critics, this is a lousy line of thinking when it comes to character writing. Sola lacks even a hint of interior life; her goals are all external in that they’re physical, which are a) to one day rule an empire as Sol’s wife/property, and b) to get her pussy licked. Sadly (for both Sola and the reader) these two goals are mutually exclusive, for a reason I have the misfortune of knowing. It’s time to get into spoilers, but I do wanna make one more criticism that may not be as much of a deal-breaker for some people: the action is somewhat boring. I don’t know what Anthony’s status as a writer of action scenes is, but whenever there’s a battle circle fight (and there are a few in the back end of Part 1), my eyes glaze over. Our Heroes™ also have run-ins with creatures of the wasteland such as killer shrews (yeah) and poisonous white moths that are little better to read about. Still better than some of the dialogue, which threatened to kill me.
Okay, enough fucking around, let’s get to spoilers.
There Be Spoilers Here
Particularly I wanna talk about a section in the middle when Sol is out of commission, having been bitten by one of the aforementioned white moths and with Sos having to carry him. It’s here, when the trio are in the badlands (later to serve as a training ground for men in Sol’s tribe), that the sexual tension between Sos and Sola reaches painful levels. A question that had been simmering in our minds (both mine and Sos’s) is why Sola and Sol agree to stay together despite being like oil and water; at first Sos thinks it’s that they’re dynamite in the sack, but it turns out there would not even be a fizzle in their bed. Undressing an unconscious Sol at one point, Sos and Sola discover to their horror that something is wrong with Sol’s junk. “Sol would never be a father. No wonder he sought success in his own lifetime. There would be no sons to follow him.” There’s the implication that Sol is a eunich, although I like to think his cock just looks really funny. In a show of mercy Anthony refrains from describing Sol’s deformity in detail; he also spares us of having to read the inevitable sex scene between Sos and Sola (the latter all but blackmailing the former into it), although that probably has more to do with editorial precaution than Anthony’s own.
For a time Sos is basically the one running the show, and after the trio’s encounter with the shrews (but why shrews) they start recruiting men deemed able enough to join the tribe. Like I said, trial by combat. Sos is intelligent and physically attractive enough to catch the eye of several women (who, being unmarried, are nameless), but turns them down because he is still weaponless; he also has his eyes set on Sola still, in spite of his better judgment. “Possession of a woman was the other half of manhood,” (ech) and clearly Sos’s lack of a weapon would be a metaphor for his lack of manhood (as in his dick). I do appreciate the irony of Sos being quite capable as both a fighter and lover despite being weaponless while Sol, the warrior who can do well with any weapon, is impotent; it’s a shame that this is buried under a shit-colored pile of male chauvinism and treating women as things to be owned. Why Sos has not started training with a new weapon I don’t know. We know that Sos will at some point apparently take on rope (huh) as his new weapon of choice, going by the novel’s title. I assume we’ll get more answers in the next installment, but something tells me thosse answered will be unsatisfying, not to mention there are simply too many holes in the worldbuilding for the ship to not sink.
A Step Farther Out
See you next time.



