
Who Goes There?
Karen Joy Fowler was born in 1950, in Indiana, but her family then moved to California. She came to writing in her thirties, with a flurry of short stories in the latter half of the ’80s; looking at her bibliography, it looks like she wrote about half of her short stories over a five-year span. Fowler is almost certainly the most high-profile talent to have made her debut in the annual Scientology-backed Writers of the Future anthology series, although to my knowledge she is not a Scientologist. (Incidentally today’s story is centered around a cult.) Over the past few decades she’s found success writing both SFF and non-genre fiction, with her 2004 novel The Jane Austen Book Club becoming a mainstream bestseller and the audience for it probably being unaware that most of what Fowler’s written (at least at short lengths) has been science fiction and fantasy. Speaking of which, she hasn’t written too much short fiction since the early ’90s, but funnily enough what she began to lack in quantity she made up for in quality. “Always” won the Nebula for Best Short Story and got nominated for the Theodore Sturgeon Memorial Award, despite the lack of a Hugo nomination. It marked Fowler’s first appearance in Asimov’s in ten years, and is not science fiction at all but rather a drama with an unexplained fantasy element.
Placing Coordinates
First published in the April-May 2007 issue of Asimov’s Science Fiction. It’s been reprinted in Science Fiction: The Best of the Year, 2008 Edition (ed. Rich Horton), Year’s Best SF 13 (ed. David G. Hartwell and Kathryn Cramer), and the Fowler collection What I Didn’t See and Other Stories.
Enhancing Image
Something that only occurred to me after the fact is that we never get the narrator’s name in this. The narrator, who at least started out as a 17-year-old girl, gets kicked out of her mom’s house and decides to hit the road with Wilt, her sort-of-friend-sort-of-boyfriend who’s nearly a decade older than her, and the two make their way to Always. This is in 1938. Always is a commune that was founded in the 1920s by one Brother Porter, who’s of indeterminate age of who is at least old enough to have a 14-year-old son. “I can’t tell you how old Brother Porter was, because he always said he wouldn’t give an irrelevant munber the power of being spoken out loud. He was a fine-looking man though. A man in his prime.” Right away we’re given the impression that Brother Porter is a suspicious man, who claims the ability to grant immortality (in the sense that people do not age) despite not having any apparent means of doing so, and more importantly the fact that he keeps the men and women (even the married couples) of the town in separate dorms and solicits sex from the latter group. Apparently the men are supposed to take some vow of celibacy. Homosexuality is not allowed. Drinking’s not allowed either, although less as a rule and more something that’s treated as a social taboo. So Always is a dry town. The townsfolk work jobs, but are supposed to give Brother Porter their paychecks, which begs the question of what the point of money here is. This is not a utopian socialist commune, but rather a society based in religion.
Indeed there’s very little that can be considered utopian about Always, even just from the first few pages of what is always a brief story. A society in which both hard drinking and free love are taboo, and yet one in which money is still a thing, is surely not a society that can be worth much of a damn. There’s also the fact that most of the people in town are much older than the narrator, ranging from middle-aged to elderly. A society predominantly comprised of people who are of retirement age or close to it surely can’t be much to write home about either. The husbands who live here are also strangely fine with getting cucked by the resident cult leader, and said cult leader (so we’re told by a few characters) also just so happens to be very good at sex. This all sounds implausible, but then you could look at just about any cult that’s taken off in the real world, whether it be Heaven’s Gate or the Church of Scientology, and wonder how any mature and rational person could buy into such a thing. Yet it has happened and continues to happen, despite our rationality telling us that this can’t be. “Always” is partly about cults and how a cult might sprout from the filthy mud of some person’s imagination, but it’s more focused on the alienation that seems to happen inevitably between cult followers and the rest of the world. In real life this alienation takes the form of a subtle change in personality, in a person’s outlook, but here Fowler treats it more literally. Consider, for one, the narrator’s anxiety about not aging:
At first. Brother Porter discouraged field trips, and then later we just found we had less and less in common with people who were going to die. When I complained about how old everyone else at Always was, Wilt pointed out that I was actually closer in age to some seventy-year-old who, like me, was going to live forever, than to some eighteen-year-old with only fifty or so years left. Wilt was as good with nmnbers as he was with cars and he was as right about that as everything else.
Once the townsfolk become convinced they will live forever they start perceiving time in a different and strange way, and the narrator is not immune to this. Of course, another question is why you would want to live forever if you’re already elderly and with one foot in the grave. Surely nobody would want to be old for the rest of eternity. There’s an old lady here, Winnifred Allington, who constantly complains about her arthritus, something that will never go away no matter how long she lives. Imagine having your joints ache and burn for a hundred years. This doesn’t sound like a very good deal to me. Wilt eventually agrees, because he leaves Always in 1941, when the US gets directly involved in WWII, and never returns. He seems to have the right idea. It would be ironic, at least, if Wilt were to get killed in the war, but instead he comes out of it just fine. The narrator, meanwhile, goes through a change, her mind not so much eroding as slowing down to the slowness of glacier—not that she becomes dumber, but rather she stops caring about normal human things. She stops getting attached to the animals at the zoo. She stops reading books and listening to music for fun. She even stops partaking in Always social life, since she stops seeing her fellow immortals as people and more as machines that are programmed to do and say the same things each day. There’s nearly a whole page of her just listing things the immortals repeat on a regular basis, probably without realizing how dull they themselves are.
I’ve seen reprints and other reviews called “Always” science fiction, but I’m not sure how it qualifies. It barely even counts as fantasy, never mind SF. The immortality trick Brother Porter pulls is never given an explanation—neither an SFnal nor supernatural one. The only maybe-supernatural thing that happens is that maybe the narrator doesn’t age over the course of several years; but the passage of time is vague enough, and we’re given so little as to the narrator’s own appearance, that we’re not sure if she’s still physically a teen girl by the end. Never mind that it’s off-putting that Brother Porter takes her on as a sexual partner despite being at least old enough to be her dad, and nobody in-story questions this. There is, in fact, very little that the characters come to question or wonder about. The only speculation that occurs is how the story observes the narrator’s changing mentality, in that Fowler speculates on how even the assumption of immortality might change someone’s attitude toward life over a period of years. Why act fast if you have more time than you could possibly know what to do with? Here’s a memorable passage detailing the narrator’s mindset, in a story that, to its credit, has its share of zingers:
I talked less and less. At first, my brain tried to make up the loss, dredging up random flashes from my past—advertising slogans, old songs, glimpses of shoes I’d worn, my mother’s jewelry, the taste of an ant I’d once eaten. A dream I’d had in which I was surrounded by food that was bigger than me, bread slices the size of mattresses, which seems like it should have been a good dream, but it wasn’t. Memories fast and scattershot. It pleased me to think my last experience of mortahty would be a toothpaste commercial. Clood-bye to all that.
Then I smoothed out and days would go by when it seemed I hardly thought at all. Tree time.
She becomes less like a human being, but unlike her fellow immortals she becomes more like a tree rather than a machine. She becomes more connected to nature. For all the strangeness of Always, the locale is very nice, as it’s located near the California coast and people are allowed to venture outside the town. So that’s something.
There Be Spoilers Here
Nothing lasts forever—not even the town where the people are supposed to live forever. It shouldn’t be surprising that the party must end, although how it ends is a bit funny. One of the more eccentric immortals, Frankie Frye, got the bright idea to test Brother Porter’s immortality by poisoning him. She didn’t do this out of malice, mind you, but as a genuine act of faith. “[Frankie] was so worked up and righteous, she made the rest of us feel we hadn’t ever had the same faith in Brother Porter she’d had or we would have poisoned him ourselves years ago.” Of course, it’s hard to feel bad for the man, since he was like a less pedophilic David Koresh. Being immortal, it turns out, does not mean you can’t be killed. The result is sort of a chain reaction, in which some more immortals get killed in horrible and inexplicable ways. The faith the collective had held had been broken. Ultimately the only person who decides to stay in Always is the narrator—a fact that she doesn’t seem to mind much. She has the trees and mountains for company, after all. (I guess this is supposed to be a bittersweet ending.)
A Step Farther Out
I wasn’t a fan, sorry. When it comes to fantasy fiction I’m fine with the lack of a “why” in the storytelling, but at some point the deliberate ambiguity the author invokes as to what is happening is supernatural or not that wearies me such that I stop wondering at all. Instead I start wondering about other things, these things having to do with the logic of the story, and that’s when it stops being fun. You can certainly poke holes in the fabric of “Always,” even with it being so concise, but the problem is that I should not feel compelled to poke holes in the story if I’m enjoying it enough. I feel as if Fowler had an idea, and something of a vignette to go with the idea, but it’s so lacking in “why” and “how” that it threatens to evaporate. I’m a little confused as to the Nebula win, as well as why multiple sources call it science fiction, because it seems as if we had read different stories. In fairness to Fowler, she’s quite good at dialogue and internal monologues, which I already knew from other short stories of hers I’ve read—just that in the case of “Always” I feel like this talent was in service of slight material.
Oh, well.
See you next time.








