-
Short Story Review: “Mood Bender” by Jonathan Lethem

(Cover artist not credited. Crank!, Spring 1994.) Who Goes There?
I don’t often get the chance to talk about authors not totally embedded in the realm of genre SF, which makes someone like Jonathan Lethem a bit of a treat. Lethem is nowadays known as a “literary” writer, with non-SF works like Motherless Brooklyn and The Fortress of Solitude gaining him a foothold in the literary crowd, if not exactly the mainstream. But unlike some other writers who started out writing genre who then tried distancing themselves from genre trappings, Lethem never forgot his roots. Indeed for someone who’s not primarily known as an SF writer, at least half of Lethem’s novels are SF, including his first four novels. He’s also unabashedly a Philip K. Dick fan, even going to far as to edit Dick’s Exegesis for book publication. Today’s story was published the same year as Lethem’s debut novel, Gun, with Occasional Music, and like that novel it wears its Dick influence on its sleeve—not in a bad way, of course.
Placing Coordinates
First published in the Spring 1994 issue of Crank!, which is on the Archive. It’s been reprinted only once, in the anthology The Best of Crank! (ed. Bryan Cholfin). Much of Lethem’s short fiction has not been collected outside of anthologies, so this is not unusual.
Enhancing Image
This is a cautionary tales of sorts, about a salesman and an artist. The salesman is Pete Flost, and he sells robotic puppets to schoolkids. After school the kids swarm out like bugs and Flost, along with the competition, stands by with his trunk of merchandise. The puppets sell for very cheap, since they’re aimed at children—but that’s not where the money comes from. “Clients paid Desani and Sons large figures to equip the puppets with advertising programs, aimed at the buyers’ parents.” Flost works for Desani and Sons, who in turn work for advertisers. When in doubt, turn to ads. Flost has a digital wristband telling him his bank information; so do the kids. (Where do they get their money from? I would assume allowance.) The kids, like their adult counterparts, are fickle; they’re quickly learning how to think in a capitalist environment. Much to Flost’s dismay the turnout for his merchandise is underwhelming, and to make matters worse he then has to pay a ticket for speeding. Tellingly we’re not even told Flost’s name for the first few pages; he’s just “the salesman,” and indeed he’ll mostly be called that throughout the story. He’s a salesman down on his luck, and as a cog in the machine he’s not much more than that.
We cut to the artist, Zigmund Figment, who’s kind of a fraud, or as we say in a post-Hans Zimmer post-James Patterson post-Drake world, someone who makes art… with some uncredited help. That’s not the point. The irony is that despite being a salesman who sells “banal commercial narrative dolls” for a living, Flost is not a cynic; he means well. Meanwhile Figment is ruthlessly cynical—opportunistic, sure, but he also has open contempt for his own customers. It’s during a heated discussion with one of these customers that a random idea pops into Figment’s head: that he could make a killing selling something as cheap as disposable as those dolls. “There could be something there.” The dolls, acting alive but being non-sentient, are characters with their own programmed narratives, set to deactivate permanently after a 24-hour cycle. But suppose the character of one of these dolls was based on a person? And that’s how Figment comes into contact with Desani and Sons, and more specifically how he teams up with Flost—to use the salesman’s likeness for a doll Figment has in mind. The puppet salesman will serve as the basis for a salesman puppet.
On the one hand, this is a very Philip K. Dick story; it’s the kind of story he might’ve written had he lived through the Reagan years. I don’t mean this as a bad thing, even if it does smack of derivativeness. Lethem would move away from this heightened satirical brand of SF as he got older, and it’s not hard to see why; but also in some ways (though it pains me to say this as a fellow Dickhead) Lethem is a better writer than Dick. His sentences are less stilted and he’s able to pack almost a novel’s worth of detail into just a few pages, such that you could probably write a whole short story about just the dolls, but here they’re merely an accessory to the larger narrative. Dick was arguably the greatest critic of American capitalism among genre SF writers in his time, and Lethem continues this ruthlessness by presenting a shadowy and greedy landscape that lacks any semblance of spirituality—a film noir world without a detective. Flost is by no means a hero, but then Figment isn’t what you’d call a villain either; he’s merely a business-minded fellow who wants to take advantage of the system he was born into. He’s disgusted with the system (and with himself, really) but feels he has no power to change it. When Flost asks him why he’d wanna make a salesman puppet, Figment replies, “I’m looking for a medium that metaphorizes the temporal, presold, infantilizing, reflexive qualities of contemporary artistic expression, my own especially.” He knows it’s all a game.
“Mood Bender” is loose on plot but tight on character and substance; what it lacks in cohesion of events it makes up for in the density of its world and the sheer existential dread of its characters. Figment is a scumbag, casually rude to restaurant staff so he can get a discount, that sort of thing, but he’s also the man with the vision. That Figment is the assertive one of the two while Flost is weak-willed (a bit of a Willy Loman figure) speaks bleakly of both of them. Being an “artist” but not someone who wants to put in all the hours of work and solitude to make his art, Figment also hooks up with Ben Iffman, a friend of Flost’s and a designer for the puppets. “It wasn’t that Iffman’s designs necessarily sold more than anyone else’s, but handling them meant something to the salesman.” The problem is that this arrangement ends up working too well. Iffman catches on to Figment’s idea so fast he starts selling his puppets to the same clientele before Figment’s own plan can come to fruition. Without Iffman, and with his sales declining, Flost loses his job at Desani and Sons (although they don’t word it like that), and Figment for his troubles gets beat at his own game. As is typical of Lethem, the best laid plans of mice and men come to naught.
There Be Spoilers Here
Lethem asks a scary question: Are we somehow product? And if we’re product then does that mean we can be replaced? On his last day with Desani and Sons Flost is treated more like faulty machinery than a flesh-and-blood person who has to pay rent. Figment, who really always treated his art as both product and extensions of himself, gets what you might call his just desserts when people stop buying his shit. In the last stretch of the story, after both men have fallen from grace and been relegated to vagrancy, we see a robot priest—not sentient, but merely a machine that spouts pre-programmed platitudes. We have killed God—not with philosophy or even with machinery, but with dollars. The world in-story is in very bad shape. The only real refuge from this might be cold sleep, which curiously serves a similar function in Gun, with Occasional Music, as a kind of debtor’s prison. Run out of money and struggling to find a job? How about you slip into a coma. By the end of the story we’ve come back to the place we started at, with the schoolkids, only now Flost and Figment are drunkards poking fun at their own dashed hopes of success. Did I mention this is bleak?
A Step Farther Out
This is a good enough story that Lethem could’ve sold it to a higher-paying market—but then how many outlets published post-cyberpunk material like this in 1994? Lethem appeared in Asimov’s several times, but not in this case. Omni was on its way out. Interzone is British. There weren’t many markets for short SF at the time, which might be one reason Lethem hasn’t written much short SF; and when it came to novels he would eventually get to writing non-SF work, although the noir aspect very much remained. “Mood Bender” is short but brutal; it’s at times funny, but it’s by no means light reading. If you’re reading this then you’ve probably already ready some Lethem, but if not then it’s a good place to start.
See you next time.
-
Novella Review: “Oceanic” by Greg Egan

(Cover by John Foster. Asimov’s, August 1998.) Who Goes There?
We last covered Greg Egan with his 2002 quantum computing novella “Singleton,” which was very typical Egan; now we have something more atypical. Egan is one of the quintessential transhumanist writers in SF and one of the leading figures of the post-cyberpunk era in the ’90s; but “Oceanic” is not cyberpunk at all. Here we have a coming-of-age story on an alien planet, about a young man’s crisis of faith through both religion and sex, apparently inspired by Egan’s own disillusionment with Christianity in his youth as recounted in his autobiographical essay “Born Again, Briefly,” which I highly recommend reading as a kind of double feature with “Oceanic.” Indeed despite the exotic locale this reads as one of Egan’s most personal works, and while it isn’t cyberpunk it does manage to veer back into some go-to Egan themes. The gambit paid off, as it remains Egan’s single most decorated story, having won the Hugo for Best Novella as well as placed first in the Locus and Asimov’s readers’ polls for that year. It might also be my favorite Egan story I’ve read so far.
Placing Coordinates
First published in the August 1998 issue of Asimov’s Science Fiction, which is on the Archive. Gardner Dozois liked this story so much he bought it for Asimov’s, but then reprinted it in The Year’s Best Science Fiction: Sixteenth Annual Collection and The Best of the Best Volume 2: 20 Years of the Year’s Best Short Science Fiction Novels. It’s in the Egan collection Oceanic, and of course it’s also in The Best of Greg Egan. You can read it free online at Egan’s site, so you don’t have an excuse!
Enhancing Image
Sometimes when I’m reviewing a story I feel like I’m struggling to come up with things to say about it, but with “Oceanic” there’s no such problem—especially if you know how autobiographical it is. But first some context. We’re on the planet Covenant, over a thousand years after humanoids (I say “humanoids” because it doesn’t look like normal humans had come to the planet in the first place), and we follow Martin, who as narrator is writing what you might call a fictional memoir, recounting from the time he was about ten to when he was deep in his twenties. Martin and his family are “Freelanders,” in that they live on the vast waters of the planet, unlike the “Firmlanders” who live primarily on land. Martin’s family are Transitional, that is to say mildly religious, but Martin’s older brother, Daniel, joins the Deep Church, a fundamentalist sect, when he’s fifteen (David being five years Martin’s senior). Daniel tries to convert Martin, and in a scene ripped straight from Egan’s own life (his older brother having split from their Anglican family and converted to Catholicism as a teenager), the two kneel by Martin’s bed one night and pray to Beatrice, the Christ-like figure of the religion. But Martin hasn’t really been converted yet. “I wasn’t sure that I wanted Beatrice to change my mind, and I was afraid that this display of fervour might actually persuade Her.” The practice starts as more out of respect for Daniel than believing his faith, but Martin will soon go through a rite of passage that will turn him into a firm believer—for a while. This is all told with melancholy hindsight.
“Oceanic” is a coming-of-age narrative, or a bildungsroman, about a boy crossing the shadow-line (to steal Conrad) into maturity—a crossing that tends to be not one experience but several key turning points. The first major turning point for Martin is arguably not kneeling with Daniel that one night, but taking part in the Drowning, a ritual in which someone is submerged in the depths of Covenant’s waters—so far down that it would seem suicidal, and yet this near-death experience is euphoric, at least if the person accepts Beatrice in their heart. Martin is Drowned one day, with Daniel as his second, and this experience in the depths, by his lonesome, makes him feel like he’s somehow become one with Beatrice. A switch gets flipped inside his head. Getting Drowned is something only the Deep Church people do, as others see it as dangerous and an aberration, something fundamentalists do; but his Drowning causes a religious awakening in Martin. As he struggles in the depths he recounts the story of Beatrice and the “Angels” as written in the Scriptures. This is where things gets pretty strange, and dense, in the sense that Egan seems to have developed a whole origin story for the people of this planet—one that is clearly adjacent to Christianity, although there’s a transhumanist twist that’s more implied than explained. While submerged, Martin takes in a gulp of the seawater, and at this moment light floods his vision, leaving “a violet afterimage” once it recedes and Daniel brings him back to the surface, the Drowning successful.
The irony is that after this point Martin and Daniel’s relationship weakens, granted that part of this is to be expected given their age gap. Martin gets involved with Daniel’s Prayer Group, but soon grows tired of it. “What did I have in common with them, really?” The brothers grow apart. Daniel gets married young to a fellow Deep Church person named Agnes and the two lead a boring, traditional life thereafter. Some years pass and now Martin’s a teenager. It’s at this point that I should probably mention the eccentric biology of the humans in this story. Something I noticed only after the fact is that Egan refrains from giving physical descriptions of characters really, and this could be for a few reasons, but one reason I can think of is that the characters are physically androgynous—they, in fact, have physical traits of both male and female, and even functioning sex organs that would normally be unique to either. They’re true hermaphrodites, “women and men were made indistinguishable in the sight of God.” What gender someone identifies as really does come down to their self-perception rather than their sex. I’m bringing this up now because it’ll soften the blow for when we get to what is perhaps the most important scene in the story—and also the most unusual. When Daniel gets married Martin meets up with one of Agnes’s cousins, Lena, a Firmlander who nonetheless is very interested in the way Freelanders live. The two hit it off and enter a sort of casual relationship, and it doesn’t take long for sex to enter the picture.
So, in a bildungsroman, it’s not uncommon for the protagonist’s first sexual experience to serve as a turning point in the narrative, as a euphoric or traumatic experience. One’s first time is rarely all that. I myself didn’t lose my virginity till I was 21, and it was with someone I was not in a relationship with; it was a one-time thing, but the important thing is that we were nice to each other and there was certainly no pain in it. A lot of people aren’t so lucky. Poor Martin over here has one of the strangest first times possible—not because the sex with Lena goes wrong exactly but because there’s a certain part of the exchange nobody had thought to warn him about in advance. Remember how I said that the people of Covenant are hermaphrodites? Not only that, but the penis is apparently detachable. If sex happens between someone with a penis and someone with a vagina there’s a literal exchange of “the bridge,” so that after he climaxes inside Lena Martin finds, to his horror, that Lena now has his cock and that Martin, with blood on his groin, finds that a pussy has formed where his cock once was. (There’s no mention of testicles that I can recall—and no, don’t ask me to go back through to see if there is. I would have to think then that the testes are internal, somehow, but still functional. For better or worse Egan doesn’t go into great detail as to how the anatomy of these future humans could function. The effect is akin to one of Dali’s paintings, or one of the more nightmarish scenes in a Buñuel film.) Eventually Martin and Lena have sex a second time so that Martin can get his dick back; but the relationship has done sour because of that first time and they seemingly never talk again.
A lot is happening, so let’s rewind the film and take this step by step. We’re never outright told this I believe, but it’s implied pretty heavily, even early on, that the humans on Covenant are the descendants of the so-called Angels, who apparently had foregone flesh-and-blood bodies but then decided to build organic yet artificial bodies for themselves so that they could experience bodily pleasures and even mortality again. The Angels, being basically noncorporeal, are now spoken of as if they were literal angels, the “present” of the story being so far into our future that even the far future of the Angels is spoken of as if it were ancient history or myth. Egan has gone out of his to imagine a future humanity that in some ways is not so different from us, but then there’s the biology of these people. Martin losing his virginity is a traumatic event for more than one reason: it gives him gender dysphoria, makes him feel ashamed because he’s had not only had sex while unmarried but lost his “bridge” in the process, and it’s the first time in his life where the hard reality of biology shakes his faith. I probably should’ve also mentioned “Oceanic” nearly made the shortlist for the Tiptree Award. Now, transphobes might read this story and be repulsed by its implications, because it becomes obvious that, as is regularly the case with Egan’s fiction, biology is framed as tyrannical. Martin and his kind are not beholden to biology but victims of it. (I saw someone theorize that Greg Egan is actually a woman, and while it’s true we’ve never seen or heard Egan, I find this a bit far-fetched.) Indeed Martin deciding to study microbiology, under an affable but ultimately dead-end professor named Barat, will prove to make him only more miserable.
Something I’ve had to do in writing this review is go back through “Oceanic” and reread some passages, which I’m not prone to doing for these—in no small part because I know with certainty there are details I had missed on my first reading. On the one hand you could try boiling this story down to a “religion sucks” narrative, but that really would not be doing the world Egan has built justice, nor would it encapsulate the thematic depths. Granted that showing “Oceanic” to a transphobic Christian would disgruntle them, it’s more a dramatization of Egan’s own coming of age; this is his Go Tell It on the Mountain. A mild criticism I have of Egan’s writing is that when it comes to first-person narrators they tend to have more or less the same voice, which I have to take to some extent as Egan’s own voice: brooding, seemingly teetering on the line between macho and a little feminine, a sort of overly sensitive film noir detective cadence. Martin might be the most Egan-ish of Egan narrators, and yet rather than distract me this ended up being more of an asset than a negative—indeed Martin being the quintessential Egan narrator might well be the whole point. The result is that despite not having anything to do (at least directly, though it’s very much part of the backstory) with computing or quantum uncertainty, “Oceanic” manages to be thematically kin with Egan’s other work, even if on the surface it seems to hark to a kind of old-school planetary science fiction. As someone who’s not very literate in computer science (like most people) I thus found it accessible by Egan’s standards.
There Be Spoilers Here
As he ages Martin distances himself more from organized religion—first from the Deep Church and even the Transitionals, increasingly finding fault and hypocrisy in the arguments of theologians. Among his own scientific colleagues he finds himself siding more with the earnest atheists than with whom he sees as weak-willed believers. “Theology aside, the whole dynamics of the group was starting to get under my skin; maybe I’d be better off spending my time in the lab, impressing Barat with my dedication to his pointless fucking microbes.” And then tragedy strikes. Martin’s mom comes down with a severe illness, and by the time he gets to hospital she has already died. Daniel was there, but this ends up being the final straw for Martin’s perception of him, for according to Daniel’s own faith their mother is destined for Hell since she was never drowned; but upon confronting him about this bit of theology Martin finds that his fundamentalist older brother has softened—for his own sake if nobody else’s. “There was no truth in anything he said, anything he believed. It was all just an expression of his own needs.” By this point Martin has become one of those devout but rebelliously individualistic religious people, but even his personal faith has been eroding, slowly but surely. “The God of the gaps,” to use an edgy atheist phrase. What breaks the camel’s back turns out to be Martin’s own work in the microbes of Covenant’s oceans.
So, to make a long story short, the microbes in the planet’s water have this hallucinatory fucky-wucky effect if taken into one’s body in concentrated form. The humans on Covenant have adapted to these microbes in moderation, but it’s still dangerous to interact with too much, which would explain the religious experiences had by those who have Drowned. Martin’s religiousus experience, which he had kept close to his heart all these years even as his understanding of the natural world expanded, has a scientific explanation: he saw some freaky shit because he had inhaled a concentrated amount of these microbes. It’s like the SFnal version of how people who suffer from epilepsy are prone to having “religious” visions—or indeed people with schizophrenia who claim to be in touch with the divine. Biology has its way with Martin; it caresses him, withers him, takes the moon and the sun from him, takes what is in front of him and even behind from him, and at the end of the day it takes God from him.
I was lucky: I’d been born in an era of moderation. I hadn’t killed in the name of Beatrice. I hadn’t suffered for my faith. I had no doubt that I’d been far happier for the last fifteen years than I would have been if I’d told Daniel to throw his rope and weights overboard without me.
But that didn’t change the fact that the heart of it all had been a lie.
At age 25 Martin becomes an atheist, incidentally around the same age when Egan gave up his own faith. This is not a victory for atheism or any dumb bullshit like that, but rather a melancholy crossing of the shadow-line, from youth to manhood. Something is lost and gained, at the same time, like a passing of the torch. While “Oceanic” is by no means Egan’s first “mature” story (he had already written Permutation City and Disapora at this point, not to mention some pretty great short fiction), it’s a reflection on the artist (or the scientist, who anyway is adjacent to the artist) coming into his own. Maturity is not sunshine and rainbows.
A Step Farther Out
I ended up reading “Born Again, Briefly” after I had read “Oceanic” but before starting this review, which turned out to be a good idea since it helped explain the strong personal touch of this story. It’s also a bit of a mind-bender, but not for the reasons typically associated with Egan, in that you don’t have to be an amateur computer programmer to understand the point he’s trying to make. Still, it’s a dense novella that almost demands a second reading, for pleasure but also so one can soak in all the details. Egan could’ve gone farther with the gender aspect, but for 1998 it’s still pretty wild and forward-thinking. People forget that even in 1998, which for some of you was not that long ago, queer representation in SF was very… mixed. And also nearly always evidently from a cishet perspective. With that in mind, “Oceanic” has aged pretty gracefully; it also happens to be a story people new to Egan can read without issue.
See you next time.
-
Short Story Review: “Friend” by James Patrick Kelly and John Kessel

(Cover by Thomas Kidd. F&SF, January 1984.) Who Goes There?
James Patrick Kelly and John Kessel have been friends and collaborators for about forty years at this point, although they started very much apart, and each man when taken on his own is a very different beast from the other. They’ve also been at times associated with the cyberpunk movement, but neither can really be called a cyberpunk author—especially Kessel, who by 1984 had already won a Nebula for the existential nightmare (and tribute to Melville) that is “Another Orphan.” As for Kelly, I had written about his similarly anxiety-inducing cyberpunk fable “Rat” for Young People Read Old SFF. It’s been long enough since I’ve written about either. “Friend” was their first collaboration, and it would be quickly followed by the novel Freedom Beach. Kelly and Kessel gave themselves a challenge with today’s story, which was to write a personal drama aboard a luxury space cruiser with a first-person narrator. For reasons I’ll get into it’s surprising the story works as well as it does, and that Kelly and Kessel—still early in their careers—managed to bring out the best in each other.
Placing Coordinates
First published in the January 1984 issue of The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, which is on the Archive. To my shock it has been reprinted only once in English—in The Year’s Best Science Fiction, Second Annual Collection (ed. Gardner Dozois).
Enhancing Image
Jake is a Friend on the Le Corbusier, a space cruiser. A Friend is a bit of an odd job—an amalgamation of counselor and security. “During a starcrossing, a Friend has sole responsibility for the safety of his passengers; no one, not the ship’s crew, its captain, or even the president of IPT may interfere.” Which sounds like a disaster waiting to happen, and indeed Jake is telling his story with a good deal of hindsight, after his “great loss.” In the future, it has become commonplace to travel between the stars, although it still takes a lot of money and there are still risks involved. Some get to stay conscious onboard as the ship jumps through space, but others are put in cryosleep—sometimes as a form of punishment—and those in cryo are not guaranteed to survive the voyage. The following story could be considered something of a love triangle, between Jake, Leila Jahiz, and Phillip Goodson. Leila is an aspiring ballet dancer while Goodson is VP of IPT and, once upon a time, was Jake’s superior as a Friend. Mind you that being a higher-up at IPT is no joke, considering they have a monopoly on commercial space flight. Jake always hated Goodson, which may or may not color how Our Hero™ frames Goodson in his narration. Maybe it would be unfair to call Jake an unreliable narrator, but without getting into spoilers too soon it might be in his interest to make himself look less bad in his own story.
So there’s the problem of “hitchhiking” during a starcrossing, which is basically someone who doesn’t have the money to rent space on the ship hitching with someone who does. To be fair, cold sleep is somewhat dangerous, so it’s not an appetizing alternative. The dilemma here is simple: Leila wants to hitch with Goodson and use his position to help her get into the dance troupe of her choosing—which of course means the best of the best. Leila, according to Jake anyway, is not so conventionally attractive, nor does she have the magic touch expected of the top dancers; but she’s tenacious, and despite his comments on her appearance Jake still very much has a thing for her when they meet a second time. They had previously met about a decade prior, when Leila was a teen hopeful and Jake was just starting his work as a counselor, before he had even become a Friend. The two had an affair while Leila was Jake’s client, which is—bad. “I had no intention of falling in love with her,” but he did, and upon seeing each other again those feelings have returned. Now, it’s not unusual for a Friend to have sex with crossers, but it’s supposed to be done as a way to keep people happy on the ship and is done with those who aren’t looking to hitchhike. Jake even gets hit on by an underage dancer, although thankfully he seems to turn her down—or at least it looks that way.
On the night I read “Friend” I went to bed thinking randomly about what it had reminded me of, because initially I couldn’t put my finger on it. Then it occurred to me that, coincidental or not, it reads like early John Varley. I mean this in a good way. Varley was one of the best new SFF writers to debut in the ’70s and his Eight Worlds stories especially are still a lot of fun to read, although the catch is that his stuff could get a little too horny. Leila is sleeping her way up the ladder, which to her credit is a fact she makes no attempt to hide. (Something that just occurred to me as I’m writing this is that the phrase “to blow off” means “to fuck” basically, in the context of the story. Some future-history jargon?) Again, if the two hadn’t known each other beforehand it wouldn’t even be unusual for Jake to Leila to have sex on the ship. A rival dancer, Brenda, goes to Jake for a quick fuck more than once, in fact—not because she finds Jake attractive particularly but because she needs to “blow off” steam, having not gained Goodson’s favor. And Jake, seeing that this is probably for the best, goes along with her. “As I had expected, Brenda was not so much interested in me as in saving face, and a brief affair with the Friend offered her an acceptable means.” Brenda did this in the hopes of catching Goodson’s attention, maybe making him jealous; but the move doesn’t seem to have paid off, as neither Leila nor Goodson confronts her about it. It does stir gossip on the ship, which Jake was expecting. “The community of crossers is small, and boredom is its greatest enemy.” It’s a tricky situation, when you’re stuck babysitting a bunch of rich assholes and sometimes you’re called on to do things that would normally be considered very unprofessional.
Two things really struck me about this story: its pacing and the uniformity + believability of Jake’s voice as a narrator. F&SF and ISFDB count “Friend” as a novelette, but it must barely count because it’s only about fourteen magazine pages and feels even shorter than that. Even so, despite couching the drama in a far-off location and having to do some legwork to flesh out the world, it’s a neatly self-contained narrative. Despite the brevity the three main characters are written as being flawed, but not two-dimensional, although Goodson is written (or perhaps thought of) as without redeeming qualities: he’s a real asshole, despite his name. As for Jake, it’s a minor miracle Kelly and Kessel were able to not only imagine such a character but write him consistently. I have not collaborated with a fellow author in… let’s say a very long time. So I’m not sure how one would go about co-writing a story, especially in the
late Cretaceouspre-internet age. I’m curious as to who wrote what, because despite his evident internal conflict Jake has a consistent voice and the other characters are vividly drawn. Did one focus on dialogue while the other on narration? It’s an effective character drama that shows both men in control of their abilities, which is not something that can often be said of collaborations. The tragedy of the situation is maybe predictable, but it’s still heartbreaking; this is not even lessened by the foreknowledge that Jake will lose—has, in fact, already lost.There Be Spoilers Here
So, perhaps predictably, Jake and Leila have sex. “This was not the political coupling that I had had with Brenda,” he admits. This is personal. The two still want each other, but Leila wants to reach the top even more than she wants to be with Jake—not that Jake really minds that. The real problem is now he has a conflict of interest, because as a Friend he should report Leila for conspiring to hitchhike—only doing so would not only ruin her chances at success but likely ruin their friendship. Jake thinks Goodson must be putting him up to something, and he’s not totally wrong about this—only he ends up being wrong in a way he failed to expect. Goodson more or less tricks Jake into ratting out Leila, a fact he realizes too late. The truth is that Goodson doesn’t give a shit about Leila, both as a person and a dancer, and was only using her to get back at Jake. Jake was hoping to hurt Goodson but he ends up hurting someone he actually likes, although he tries his best to keep the fact that he’s the rat from Leila; whether or not she ever finds out is left ambiguous. So Jake quits his job after the voyage, in shame. It’s not a complete loss. Over the next ten years he starts his own company, becomes successful at that, and Leila even gets into the prestigious dance troupe she always wanted—even if it happened several years later than she had hoped. But the two have not spoken in years, and it’s only at the very end, when Jake goes to see one of Leila’s performances for the first time, that there’s a ray of hope for him. Now that’s a good bittersweet ending.
A Step Farther Out
“Friend” could’ve certainly been printed in Asimov’s; it might’ve been submitted there first, who’s to say. In a way you can sense this is a borderline space opera that was written following John Varley’s influence on the field, and during that era when Hollywood studios were still scrambling for the next Star Wars; but while it may strike some as retrograde now I’d actually say it has aged more gracefully than most. “Friend” works as well as it does, I suspect, because at heart Kelly and Kessel are humanists. The story is certainly SFnal enough, but ultimately it’s a story with human characters who are by no means cardboard cutouts. Given that this was considered major enough to be the cover story of the F&SF issue it first appeared in, I’m a little dismayed it hasn’t been reprinted more.
See you next time.
-
Short Story Review: “The Jaguar House, in Shadow” by Aliette de Bodard

(Cover by Tomislav Tikulin. Asimov’s, July 2010.) Who Goes There?
Aliette de Bodard was born in the US, but raised in France to Vietnamese parents, such that French is her first language but she writes her fiction in English. This cultural mix perhaps inspired one of the most unique alternate/future histories to come about in the past couple decades. Her defining series, of which today’s story is a part, shows us an altered human history in which the Chinese discovered America before a certain Italian son of a bitch could get there, with the Americas changing in major ways politically and sociologically. “The Jaguar House, in Shadow” was de Bodard’s first story to garner a Hugo nomination, and indeed shows a leap forward in ambition, especially in terms of its structure. The story’s back-and-forth narrative ends up being a double-edged sword, but it remains an effective tale of friendship, betrayal, and revenge.
Placing Coordinates
First published in the July 2010 issue of Asimov’s Science Fiction, which is on the Archive. It has since been reprinted in English twice, in Nebula Awards Showcase 2012 (ed. James Patrick Kelly and John Kessel), and the de Bodard collection Of Wars, and Memories, and Starlight.
Enhancing Image
We start with a scene all in italics, and we’re not told who the viewpoint character is other than that it’s “she.” (Mind you all three of the main characters are women.) The beginning reminded me of the opium-induced haze at the start of Once Upon a Time in America, although in this case it’s magic mushrooms rather than opium, “teonanácatl.” We then flash back… then flash back again… then flash forward… then flash back… then forward again. That’s how it generally goes. We’re quickly faced with this story unique quality, for both good and ill, which is the jumping back and forth along a timeline, tracing the friendship between three friends and members of the Jaguar House: Onalli, Xochitl, and Tecipiani. Some stories in the Xuya universe are space opera, but this one is not: we’re firmly set on Earth, more specifically in Mexico—a Mexico that is quite different from what we now recognize. The actual year in which the story takes place is vague, and at first you might even think it’s some fantasy realm, with the mentioning of Houses, warriors, and some real cloak-and-dagger espionage; but also there are computers, and even nanomachines. Evidently true artificial intelligence has not come about yet, although Xochitl does speculate on it at one point, in perhaps the single most memorable passage in the story and one which seems deliberately to foreshadow the spacefaring antics of stories happening later in the timeline:
Xochitl wonders what kind of intelligence computers will develop, when they finally breach the gap between automated tasks and genuine sentience—all that research done in military units north of the border, eyeing the enemy to the south.
They’ll be like us, she thinks. They’ll reach for their equivalent of clubs or knives, claiming it’s just to protect themselves; and it won’t be long until they sink it into somebody’s chest.
Just like us.
The Jaguar House is one of what used to be several Houses in the region, each of which had fallen for one reason or another. This is a land of “true Mexica” meeting with would-be colonizers—not Europeans but south-east Asians, “though Onalli, who’s half and half, could almost pass for Asian herself.” The perspective shifts back and forth between Onalli and Xochitl, and at the same time we’re jumping between flashbacks, which makes it a challenge to discuss the story’s plot. I have to admit I also occasionally got Onalli and Xochitl confused, which is not helped by the two women not having easily distinguishable personalities. Going into “The Jaguar House, in Shadow,” I was expecting a novelette since that’s what this issue of Asimov’s classifies it as (by the way, the page number in the table of contents is wrong), but if it’s a novelette then it barely counts. Granted, these are a dense dozen or so magazine pages, but if anything I would’ve preferred if de Bodard had made it into a heartier novelette. Not every scene gets proper breathing space and the main characters are not given equal attention, although in the case of Tecipiani the ambiguity of her thoughts and feelings seems to have been intentional. “Tecipiani does what she believes in; but you’re never sure what she’s truly thinking,” Xochitl thinks.
The three start as knights of the House, but Tecipiani gets promoted to commander, to where she is giving her friends orders. Worse yet, there’s been tension brewing within the House—talks of rebellion against the Revered Speaker, who’s said to have become corrupt. Xochitl is involved in this would-be rebellion, with tragic results. Onalli is torn, ultimately, between two friends, one of whom is likely to be killed, the other quickly becoming little more than a stranger to her. It’s a good conflict, and could’ve feasibly worked in a medieval fantasy setting; but de Bodard is equally interested in the world these characters inhabit, which is decidedly science fiction. This is very much a “What if?” scenario. “What if the Puritans never landed in what is now New England? What if the colonial Chinese set up camp in the Americas ahead of even the Spanish? How much would technological development change? Who would be in charge?” It’s not wish-fulfillment. The Americas are not necessarily better off in Chinese hands, nor worse; but the differences would be profound. Maybe humanity really will start conquering the stars, but then maybe the problems of feudalism and oligarchy would remain. At one point, in a rather throwaway passage, there’s mention of “revivalists” among the pure Mexica who believe in human sacrifice, something which would be unthinkable in our timeline. It’s this sort of detail that keeps bringing me back to de Bodard’s Xuya stories.
There Be Spoilers Here
We’ve deduced by now that Tecipiani is the one in the beginning and ending scenes with the magic mushrooms—the one who turned her back on her friends in the name of realpolitik. We don’t know what happened with Onalli, after she had fled with a dying Xochitl in her arms. The story ends on a sign of uncertainty in everything, except for guilt. Tecipiani is unsure if the betrayal was worth it. The question lingering at the end is one of emotional loyalty, but also one of political loyalty: the state versus the individual. Which is more valuable, stability or freedom? Tecipiani’s mindset is that by keeping the Jaguar House afloat she can avert the bad ends that befell the other Houses, but in-story we’re not given much evidence to believe society would suddenly turn dystopic if the Jaguar House were to fall—i.e., if a vestige of “law and order” were to give way to anarchy. I could be biased, but if anything I saw the implication that the Jaguar House deserves to fall—that it has somehow become rotten from the inside, ready to sink into a swamp, like the House of Usher. The beginning is finally given context and at the same time the anachronic points of the story finally meet, like two ends of a circle. It’s at times confusing, but I have to say the climactic confrontation and the very end are well done.
A Step Farther Out
De Bodard would’ve been 25 or 26 when she wrote this one, still very early in her career, and while it shows the roughness of a young writer finding her voice it’s also an intriguing and emotionally effective thriller that would’ve introduced readers to a world decidedly different from ours, but not necessarily utopian or dystopian—just different. Even at this early point de Bodard’s control of mood and worldbuilding has to be admired. Her blending of SF and fantasy elements reminds me of Jack Vance on a good day. And speaking of Vance… he’s due next.
See you next time.
-
Short Story Review: “The Defenders” by Philip K. Dick

(Cover by Ed Emshwiller. Galaxy, January 1953.) Who Goes There?
Philip K. Dick is arguably both the funniest and scariest writer to emerge from the early ’50s genre SF boom. He wanted to write full-time for a living, and as a result he wrote at a mile a minute; he would wrote some 120 short stories, about a quarter of which would be published in 1953 alone. “The Defenders” is one of those stories. I’ll say upfront that this is not top-tier Dick, although it is curious for a few reasons and I do have to recommend it. For one, this was the first Dick story to make the cover of a magazine, hence the memorable Ed Emshwiller illustration. It’s also one of only two Dick stories to get adapted for the SF radio series X Minus One, the other being the bone-chilling (and darkly humorous) “Colony.” “The Defenders” and “Colony” were published in Galaxy Science Fiction, which had partnered with X Minus One such that the latter often adapted stories from the former’s pages. Despite being so prolific in the ’50s, Dick only appeared in Galaxy a handful of times while H. L. Gold was editor, apparently because (as often happened with Gold) the two did not get along. Gold had a reputation for meddling with authors’ manuscripts, and indeed there’s a sense of meddling with today’s story. Gold shouldn’t feel too bad, though: Dick would appear in Astounding only a single time.
Another couple things. “The Defenders” reads like a companion piece to “Second Variety,” which I reviewed a minute ago. Both stories cover basically the same topic, and given that they were published five months or so apart it’s safe to say Dick wrote them in close succession; but apart from having similar premises they’re very different stories. More importantly is that Dick would cannibalize the premise and twist of “The Defenders” for the much later novel The Penultimate Truth, and if you know the twist of that novel then you can safely guess the twist of this story. I won’t say what the twist is here, but it’s not hard to figure out.
Placing Coordinates
First published in the January 1953 issue of Galaxy Science Fiction, which is on the Archive. “The Defenders” wouldn’t see book publication until Invasion of the Robots (ed. Roger Elwood). Other anthology appearances include There Will Be War (ed. John F. Carr and Jerry Pournelle), Battlefields Beyond Tomorrow: Science Fiction War Stories (ed. Martin H. Greenberg and Charles G. Waugh), and Sense of Wonder: A Century of Science Fiction (ed. Leigh Ronald Grossman). It’s also in *checks notes* every other Dick collection you can think of. To make things even better, it’s fallen out of copyright, so you can read it on Project Gutenberg here.
Enhancing Image
The Cold War went hot eight years ago, with Americans and Soviets having since burrowed underground, hunkering in shelters while the robots, “leadys,” continue to fight the good fight on the surface. The humans would do the fighting themselves, but nuclear fallout from the war’s beginning has rendered the surface uninhabitable—we know this because of newsreel footage and newspaper photos taken of the surface, the leadys keeping humanity updated on a war that seemingly has no end point. “Nobody wanted to live this way, but it was necessary.” Don Taylor is part of his bunker’s military personnel, although despite being in touch with the top brass the higher-ups don’t have a better idea of what’s going on aboveground than Taylor does. (I should probably take a moment to mention that Taylor’s wife, Mary, is in the classic Dick mold, in that she’s rather shrewish. Do not do a drinking challenge where you take a shot every time Dick writes a miserable couple wherein the husband has to put up with his unpleasant wife or ex-wife. What do you mean Dick was already divorced once at this point?) The higher-ups sometimes interrogate leadys to get a more direct line to what’s going on above, but this only goes so far. Nobody, at least on this side, has been to the surface in eight years.
The leadys are the most curious part of the story that isn’t the twist, being shown in the Emshwiller cover. They’re called “leadys” because their lead shells protect them from the radiation on the surface, although they have to be decontaminated every time one is brought underground. It’s also unclear just how they work in the ethical sense, since they’re programmed to not knowingly harm humans—or at least humans on the right side of the conflict, depending. This raises the question of what exactly the leadys are good for, aside from maybe fighting other leadys. Dick seems to conform to Asimov’s three laws of robotics, but he doesn’t delve deep into the matter. The humans bring down a leady for questioning one day and find, to their surprise, that the leady is not radioactive, nor does its chassis have the intense heat of radiation. Don and his superiors figure something must be up, although they can’t be sure what, since as far as they’ve been torn war continues to wage on the surface. But then why no radiation? It’ll be risky, but it looks like humans will be going to the surface for the first time since the war went hot—in leaded clothing, of course. Taylor, his superiors, and a platoon of men plan to go up, but a team of leadys tries to stop them—a fruitless effort, given that the leadys are programmed to not kill humans and so have no way to keep them from going through the Tube.
It’s hard to discuss “The Defenders” without also discussing the twist, but I do wanna point out a couple other things. As is typical of Dick’s early work (with exceptions), the characters aren’t really characters in the Shakespearian sense so much as they exist because the narrative demands human players. Moss and Franks, Taylor’s superiors, are basically interchangeable. Past their immediate circumstances we get to learn nothing about these people. But that’s not necessarily a bad thing. Dick would become far more ambitious in psychoanalyzing his characters later on, but even at this very early stage there are a few Dick hallmarks that are comforting for the returning fan, sure, but they also serve a purpose. We know life underground is miserable because despite being in a position of authority, Taylor’s life still kinda sucks. The standard Dick protagonist leads an unfulfilled and claustrophobic existence, and this applies even to characters with power, as if to show the hollowness of wanting to acquire power for the sake of itself. Also, as is typical of Dick, the prose is often beige and economical. “The Defenders” just barely qualifies as a novelette, and it feels even shorter than that. Again, not a bad thing. I would’ve had a worse time with this story, given its setup-twist nature, had it overstayed its welcome. I also wanna say the X Minus One adaptation is perfectly decent, much like the source material; it mostly sticks to the short story, with ultimately inconsequential deviations.
There Be Spoilers Here
In one of his books of genre criticism (I forget which one), James Blish lists “The Defenders” as an example of a story whose very existence hinges on its twist, although he doesn’t elaborate on this particular story. He’s undoubtedly accurate with the call, though. If you read early Galaxy you’ll come across a lot of great short SF—indeed some of the best of its kind, certainly in the context of the early ’50s. There were also a lot of setup-punchline stories, and while these weren’t necessarily bad, they could be tiring. Robert Sheckley made a name for himself at the outset with this type of story, but even then it’s clear that he eventually got tired of the routine. Dick could also fall into this trap, and “The Defenders” might be the most setup-punchline of his story; no wonder it would be printed in Galaxy, with Gold having a fondness (really too fond) for just this type of story. And if you know The Penultimate Truth then you already knew what was coming. It turns out the war had basically been over for almost as long as the humans had been living underground. The leadys had been working on reconstructing the surface world whilst feeding the humans (on both sides) false information. That’s right, fake news was a thing in the ’50s! On the one hand this is very much a Dick idea, one he would even return to later; but the execution and implication tell me that either this twist was half-baked or Dick originally had something else in mind but changed it (or maybe Gold changed it) for the sake of appearing in Galaxy.
To elaborate, if there’s one thing Dick does unconvincingly in my experience it’s a happy ending. I’m thinking of Eye in the Sky, arguably the best of his ’50s novels, which while still being an entertaining and mind-bending read, has a tacked-on happy ending that fails to convince. The leadys destroy the Tube and prevent the team of humans from returning underground, leaving them to cooperate with the Soviets for what will probably be several years. “The working out of daily problems of existence will teach you how to get along in the same world,” the top leady says. This is all swell, but it also assumes the leadys really do have the humans’ best interests at heart, which strikes me as fundamentally uncharacteristic for Dick. Contrast this with “Second Variety,” in which the Cold War goes hot, there’s a nuclear holocaust, but the robots are more sinister there. In “The Defenders” the leadys are like a benevolent dictatorship, or Plato’s philosopher king wrapped in iron. You can see what the problem is. This is really out of step with Dick’s generally ambivalent attitude toward robots and automation at large; it’s like he tried to write an Asimov or Simak robot story. And yet it must be said that the twist on its own is good enough that you could do a lot more with it, so it’s unsurprising that Dick would cannibalize it. Still, I found myself feeling underwhelmed by the reveal.
A Step Farther Out
When Dick started out writing professionally he submitted to seemingly every market in the early ’50s, and with a few exceptions he appeared in nearly every genre magazine that would’ve been active in 1953. Sometimes he phoned it in and sometimes you get the feeling the Philip K. Dick we recognize was still in utero. “The Defenders” is very early Dick and feels less Dick-y than the stories previously covered, and of the three it’s easily my least favorite. I recommend it still, but more as a sign of the time and place in which it was written than as a sign of Dick’s genius; for that I’d point towards “Second Variety,” which as I said earlier starts out very similarly to “The Defenders” but goes in a much darker direction. “The Defenders” is an indicative Cold War SF story that happens to have been written by someone who would move on to bigger and better things—something seasoned Dickheads would not find so impressive.
See you next time.
-
Short Story Review: “Descending” by Thomas M. Disch

(Cover by Ed Emshwiller. Fantastic, July 1964.) Who Goes There?
Thomas M. Disch would go down as one of the leading writers of the New Wave era, appearing regularly in New Worlds, and you may even recall I covered the serialization of his 1967 novel Camp Concentration in that magazine’s pages last year. What tends to go ignored, however, is that despite his association with New Worlds it was really Fantastic and Amazing Stories under Cele Goldsmith-Lalli’s editorship that Disch first made his name. He had made his debut in Fantastic in 1962, only 22 years old, and his early work shows a frightening intellect that would see Disch as—along with Samuel R. Delany—an enfant terrible in the ’60s. By his thirtieth birthday he had already written a few novels and enough short stories to fill multiple volumes. Today’s story, “Descending,” possibly shows early Disch at his best; I’d even argue it’s a near-perfect story—except for one thing, which we’ll get to. While ostensibly classified as SF, “Descending” is less conventional science fiction and more existential horror crossed with one of Rudyard Kipling’s machine fables. It’s a real gem of a story.
Placing Coordinates
First published in the July 1964 issue of Fantastic, which is on the Archive. It was reprinted in the October 1992 issue of Amazing Stories, found here. Ironically “Descending” was reprinted online, but you can only access it via the Wayback Machine: it appeared in 2000 on Sci Fiction as a “classic” reprint. For For anthology reprints we have quite a few: 10th Annual Edition: The Year’s Best SF (ed. Judith Merril), Modern Science Fiction (ed. Norman Spinrad), Decade: The 1960s (ed. Brian W. Aldiss and Harry Harrison), and A Treasury of Modern Fantasy (ed. Terry Carr and Martin H. Greenberg). Unfortunately it looks like “Descending” has not been reprinted this century thus far. Can we fix this maybe?
Enhancing Image
Something that occurred to me only now is that we don’t get a name for the protagonist here. Indeed the only named character is the man’s landlady, Mrs. Beale, who appears briefly at the beginning. The man (what else do you call him?) is unemployed, behind on rent, and only able to buy stuff on credit; this was back when credit cards were a relatively new thing. Even his credit score is bad. Immediately we’re introduced to a kind of capitalist nightmare, with the protagonist being seemingly on the precipice of financial collapse, knowing he’d have to land a job soon or else hit the streets. “He had been a grasshopper for years. The ants were on to his tricks.” He’s been avoiding ruin for a minute now, but Disch sets up at the beginning that Our Anti-Hero™ is about to have a very bad day—possibly even a reckoning. It’s an ominous, paranoid start to the story, and things only get more unnerving from there. At a little under 5,000 words this story does not waste out time, but its briskness also feeds into its allegorical nature. It helps that Disch, even at this early stage (he would’ve been only 22 or 23 when he wrote “Descending”), was a fine-tuned prose stylist.
The man takes the subway to get to Underwood’s Department Store, to get some food and a couple books while he’s at it. (“What’s a department store?” is a question zoomers would be asking, and rightfully so, while also asking, “What are malls?”) He gets some groceries, including a pheasant (raw or pre-cooked he doesn’t know), plus copies of Vanity Fair and Middlemarch, of which the former he starts reading on his escalator ride from the top floor of the department store. Worth mentioning that Vanity Fair‘s subtitle is A Novel Without a Hero, and similarly “Descending” could be considered a short story without a hero, or even without characters in the traditional sense. The man is a schmuck, sure, but past that we get to know very little about him; he’s less a flesh-and-blood person and more a stand-in for man’s anxieties in an industrialized capitalist society. It’s also while reading Vanity Fair on the escalator that he realizes that he has been on this thing for, at the very least, half an hour at this point. Probably much longer. Indeed, he calculates he’d been going from escalator to escalator, ever downward, for over an hour, going from the top floor down to the basement—and then past it. He runs the numbers and it doesn’t look good. “He was in the one-hundred-fifty-second sub-basement. That was impossible.” Indeed it would be impossible, unless you’re in a nightmare.
“Descending” is obviously horror, but past that it’s hard to categorize. I tepidly count as it as SF because the role technology plays in the narrative, although it’s worth noting that we never get an SFnal rationale for why the department store escalators go down seemingly forever. This sort of thing just happens. Like I said earlier, it would be more accurate to call this story a machine fable rather than SF—one with a very dark hue. We also never encounter anyone on the escalators, such that the protagonist is unable to seek out an explanation from some third party, nor even to verbalize his anxiety to another human; it’s just him and the surreal depth of the escalators, which seem to only go down, not up. There are stairs, but at this point it would take hours to go back up to the surface that way. Aside from a water fountain every other floor the man only has his groceries to feed on; he even eventually eats the pheasant, without cooking it or anything. Gradually the man is reduced to a kind of savage. The hours turn into days. A small comfort is that with the total lack of life in the sub-basements he can relieve himself without shame. He’s torn between using the stairs, maybe in vain, to get to the surface, and wanting to see how far down the escalators go. It occurs to him that he’ll probably die here.
“Descending” is clearly an allegory, but this also raises a problem: an allegory for what? When we talk about fables and allegories we talk about something that was written to express a certain meaning, often textual if not thinly buried in subtext. This type of work is not as common now as it would’ve been in the 19th century and earlier, having emerged from actual fables (precursors to the modern short story) and epic poetry, but still there are modern examples. Steinbeck’s The Pearl is an allegory about the inherent violence of greed. Watership Down is basically a retelling of Exodus. Animal Farm is about how the Bolsheviks had murdered the Revolution in its crib. “Descending” is not as obvious about the substance of its allegorical intent, and this is where Disch starts to taunt the reader, hanging the story’s meaning like a carrot on a stick. The protagonist compares himself at different points to works of literature, including The Divine Comedy (very likely an inspiration for this story) and Robinson Crusoe, and it’s like Disch is baiting us into making a connection that ends up being hard to articulate. It’s a story about machinery, the vanity of a down-on-his-luck man, and capitalist automation, but it’s hard to parse what Dish is saying about these things. What makes it work is that even if we are to give up on untangling the substance of the fable, the primordial fear that Disch invokes is effective such that the struggle to make sense of it stops being a concern, much like how the protagonist stops trying to make sense of it. “Because he was hungry and because he was tired and because the futility of mounting endless flights of descending escalators was, as he now considered it, a labor of Sisyphus, he returned, descended, gave in.”
There Be Spoilers Here
I do have one gripe, which is the very end. The ending is not ambiguous so much as it’s worded ambiguously. The protagonist gives up and lies down on the escalator steps, and the last sentence raises a question as to what becomes of him. “That was the last thing he remembered.” Does he die, or lose his sanity? Does someone find him eventually? The wording implies he doesn’t die, but then why “remembered”? I wish writers would be more to-the-point when writing a character’s death. The thing here is that Disch had an amazing premise and knew what to do with it for 95% of the story, but then I’m pretty sure he didn’t know quite how to end it. Given the references to Sisyphus and Dante I feel like Disch could’ve ended on a note that’s at one point less ambiguous and at the same time a lot more audacious. The man wonders if he’ll reach the center of the earth if he keeps going down, but we never see the bottom of the machinery; maybe there is no bottom, like how in Mulholland Drive there may not be a mystery, once you try getting under the surrealism and free association. “Descending” doesn’t so much end as it comes to a stop, once the protagonist finds he can no longer go on and perhaps also when Disch finds he has run out of juice. It’s a little blemish on otherwise excellent writing, probably not enough to not make me give if five stars (if I gave ratings here).
A Step Farther Out
I suspect “Descending” was published in Fantastic because it’s one of those genre-bending stories that’s hard to tame. It’s been reprinted in SF and fantasy anthologies. It also had the misfortune of being published one year prior to the first Nebulas, as I think it would’ve been a shoe-in for a nomination there. (Seemingly every third short story printed in 1965 got a Nebula nomination, but “Descending” would’ve actually been deserving of it.) Disch was on a roll at this early period, and while he doesn’t quite stick the landing here, it’s such a good performance overall that I have to give it a hearty recommendation. Sometimes I struggle to write a review for something because I unfortunately felt I was not given much to talk about, but with “Descending” I had the opposite (and much better) problem: this story was almost too dense for me to write about it. Rest assured we’ll be returning to Disch before too long.
See you next time.



